This is how the Indonesian people and government have treated Rohingya refugees

He did secure a majority and he now could and wants to take the position of Prime Minister. We have to wait and see if this happens.

I've come to realize that the Dutch general election does not involve a second round. The Netherlands employs a multi-party system with proportional representation, eliminating the need for a runoff.

In the 150-seat parliament, the PVV (Freedom Party) secured 37 seats, while a left-wing bloc obtained 25 seats, and the center-right VVD secured 24. Although the PVV won the most seats among major parties, it still fell short of an outright majority, more than 50% or 75+ seats in the parliament.

The leader of the PVV must still need to engage in negotiations with other parties to form a coalition capable of holding a majority of seats in the parliament to establish a government. Other parties might not want to be part of his government. If these negotiations prove unsuccessful, other parties may be invited to attempt to form a coalition.
 
I've come to realize that the Dutch general election does not involve a second round. The Netherlands employs a multi-party system with proportional representation, eliminating the need for a runoff.

In the 150-seat parliament, the PVV (Freedom Party) secured 37 seats, while a left-wing bloc obtained 25 seats, and the center-right VVD secured 24. Although the PVV won the most seats among major parties, it still fell short of an outright majority, more than 50% or 75+ seats in the parliament.

The leader of the PVV must still need to engage in negotiations with other parties to form a coalition capable of holding a majority of seats in the parliament to establish a government. Other parties might not want to be part of his government. If these negotiations prove unsuccessful, other parties may be invited to attempt to form a coalition.
Benar! The party with the most seats usually will take the lead to form a goverment cabinet and will deliver the Prime minister ... usually. Wilders will start negotiations with VVD (25 seats) and BBB (7 seats) or NSC (20 seats).
 
Last edited:
I could easily understand the rise of far right in Europe.

The Totaling of £8 million per day, incurred solely in the UK for accommodating these people in three-star hotels. On the top of that financial support for each family member/children, free education for children, free healthcare. This financial burden is shouldered by taxpayers. EU regulations dictate that genuine refugees should seek asylum in the first safe country they reach, raising questions about the motives of those who choose not to do so.

Upon reaching the UK, using human right as a shield, it is possible to get annual benefits amounting to £25,323 pa (£2,110.25 per month) without ever contribute to the system. This monthly figure translates to IDR41 million per month at the current exchange rate, surpassing the earnings of vast majority of hardworking individuals in Indonesia. The frustration among taxpayers is palpable when considering how these funds could be utilized to aid civilians in war-torn regions or combat hunger in Africa.

The dissatisfaction with the allocation of taxpayer money by politicians might contribute to the inclination of some individuals towards far-right ideologies. This sentiment is notably different in Indonesia. The absence of government-provided benefits, social security, and free healthcare creates a stark contrast. Minimal assistance is available, primarily through the support provided by the UNHCR.

View attachment 3549
For the truth about benefits available search for Asylum Support UK.
 
I could easily understand the rise of far right in Europe.

The Totaling of £8 million per day, incurred solely in the UK for accommodating these people in three-star hotels. On the top of that financial support for each family member/children, free education for children, free healthcare. This financial burden is shouldered by taxpayers. EU regulations dictate that genuine refugees should seek asylum in the first safe country they reach, raising questions about the motives of those who choose not to do so.

Upon reaching the UK, using human right as a shield, once they are granted a permanent residency, they are entitled to benefit like anyone else. It is possible to get annual benefits amounting to £25,323 pa (£2,110.25 per month) without ever contribute to the system. This monthly figure translates to IDR41 million per month at the current exchange rate, surpassing the earnings of vast majority of hard-working individuals in Indonesia. The frustration among taxpayers is palpable when considering how these funds could be utilized to aid civilians in war-torn regions or combat hunger in Africa.

The dissatisfaction with the allocation of taxpayer money by politicians might contribute to the inclination of some individuals towards far-right ideologies. This sentiment is notably different in Indonesia. The absence of government-provided benefits, social security, and free healthcare creates a stark contrast. Minimal assistance is available, primarily through the support provided by the UNHCR.

View attachment 3549
And you wonder why they all cross France in a hurry and head for the promised land ?
 
Let's face it. Immigration problems around the world are totally out of control. Be they coming or leaving, nations need to take the upper hands.

I doubt there are but a few legitimate refugee seeking foreigners crossing boarders. The vast majority are seeking better financial status and now a days, benefits of being a refugee. Most of them, under proper vetting would not qualify for refugee status. Unfortunately, Western nations are deluged in these unqualified if they were actually investigated.

I guess I am from the old school and not progressive enough on this immigration matter. So many immigrants claim refuge from governments they don't like or are running from internal conflict. Too freaking bad. Stay where you are and make a stand to fight for what is right. Running away is the cowardly way.

Western nations have political conflicts and some are involved in wars. You don't see their citizens running away. If you don't like your government, do something to change it and don't go someplace else and argue they should change to accommodate you. They won't protest at home but are willing to in a foreign nation. That's BS.

All boarders need to be tightened drastically and only those approved through normal immigration policies allowed to cross. Refugee status need to be hardened to apply to only those that have a real need for such. They need to show they are in fact victims of persecutions. The financial improvement seekers need to be turned away. All policies that allow all in until hearings need to be hardened and that would include internment camps until hearings. Camps would have a population limit and when at capacity, boarders close until room is made. This in and of itself would hinder many from attempting boarder crossings.

Today it is totally out of control and drastic measures must be taken including rounding up those that have overstayed or entered illegally and send them back to where they came. Current immigration laws were not written for what has happened with immigration today. It will break national finances in some areas.
 
Till saturation is reached....Then it all goes to shit.
Actually, there is more strength in unity.

Anyway, the people of Aceh have experience with Rohingya refugees and they don't have the capacity to shelter them.

"Mereka memberi kesan tingkah laku dan perbuatan yang kurang baik serta tidak sesuai dengan adat dan norma-norma peraturan desa," ujar Joko.

 
Strong chance hopefully....

re-instaur border control, deport all illegals, tell Von der Leyen in Brussels to F.O. and regain our sovereignty.
This has happened prior to Brexit. It is logical for the French government to allow them to cross the channel, reducing their own burden. Even In fact, the UK government pays the French border control about €70m annually in an agreement to stop them crossing the channel. Keep in mind these people have been living in few safe countries in Europe for years. Not to mention, the EU rules stipulate that all genuine refugees must claim asylum in the first safe country they reach.

It's essential to acknowledge that these individuals also paid smugglers to help them crossing the channel. They are trained to destroy their documents, making it challenging to trace their origins.

Furthermore, there's a notable aspect of politicians and charities benefiting from taxpayer funds. Some opportunistic politicians recognize that these individuals may eventually have voting rights in the future. Lawyers get paid from taxpayer's money for representing these people. The charities benefiting government funding for humanitarian help; All are funded by the taxpayers. The system is broken.
 
Last edited:
Benar! The party with the most seats usually will take the lead to form a goverment cabinet and will deliver the Prime minister ... usually. Wilders (PVV ultra right, 37 seats) will start negotiations with VVD (25 seats) and BBB (7 seats) or NSC (20 seats).
Some already packed their bags 🤣
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20231124_073805_NOS.jpg
    Screenshot_20231124_073805_NOS.jpg
    42.4 KB · Views: 179
Last edited:
Actually, there is more strength in unity.

Anyway, the people of Aceh have experience with Rohingya refugees and they don't have the capacity to shelter them.

"Mereka memberi kesan tingkah laku dan perbuatan yang kurang baik serta tidak sesuai dengan adat dan norma-norma peraturan desa," ujar Joko.

Country of almost 300 million people has no capacity to shelter few thousand legitimate refugees, of Muslim faith on the top of it? And they rally at the same here for "Liberate Palestine"? What if hypotheticaly Palestinians ask for asylum-they will be pushed back into the sea I suppose.
 
Let's face it. Immigration problems around the world are totally out of control. Be they coming or leaving, nations need to take the upper hands.

I doubt there are but a few legitimate refugee seeking foreigners crossing boarders. The vast majority are seeking better financial status and now a days, benefits of being a refugee. Most of them, under proper vetting would not qualify for refugee status. Unfortunately, Western nations are deluged in these unqualified if they were actually investigated.

I guess I am from the old school and not progressive enough on this immigration matter. So many immigrants claim refuge from governments they don't like or are running from internal conflict. Too freaking bad. Stay where you are and make a stand to fight for what is right. Running away is the cowardly way.

Western nations have political conflicts and some are involved in wars. You don't see their citizens running away. If you don't like your government, do something to change it and don't go someplace else and argue they should change to accommodate you. They won't protest at home but are willing to in a foreign nation. That's BS.

All boarders need to be tightened drastically and only those approved through normal immigration policies allowed to cross. Refugee status need to be hardened to apply to only those that have a real need for such. They need to show they are in fact victims of persecutions. The financial improvement seekers need to be turned away. All policies that allow all in until hearings need to be hardened and that would include internment camps until hearings. Camps would have a population limit and when at capacity, boarders close until room is made. This in and of itself would hinder many from attempting boarder crossings.

Today it is totally out of control and drastic measures must be taken including rounding up those that have overstayed or entered illegally and send them back to where they came. Current immigration laws were not written for what has happened with immigration today. It will break national finances in some areas.
@fastpitch17 taking Trumpian turn.
 
Strong chance hopefully....

re-instaur border control, deport all illegals, tell Von der Leyen in Brussels to F.O. and regain our sovereingty.
I have heard prime minister of Scotland announcing that Scotland is ready to accept more refugees, in the name of humanity.
 
I have heard prime minister of Scotland announcing that Scotland is ready to accept more refugees, in the name of humanity.
The present First Minister of Scotland may be seizing opportunities to secure additional funding for providing shelter. Keep in mind in the future these people could vote. for SNP This strategic move aims at potential future support for the SNP through the votes of those benefiting from such provisions. The money will come from the UK taxpayers.
 
I have heard prime minister of Scotland announcing that Scotland is ready to accept more refugees, in the name of humanity.
Scotland doesn't have a prime minister. It has a first minister which is maybe something like a regional governor in Indonesia. They can ask for anything, knowing that the English will pay for it.
 
Scotland doesn't have a prime minister. It has a first minister which is maybe something like a regional governor in Indonesia. They can ask for anything, knowing that the English will pay for it.
Scotland was independent country that entered in personal union with England year 1707 under one (English) king. They are hardly a "region" or "province". "Prime Minister" means "First Minister" and is written with capital letters-to correct myself as well.

Latin "primus"=first
 
Well Bali was an independent country too. Maybe Aceh is a better example. Both with a strong national identity but still just a province or region like Scotland.
 
@fastpitch17 taking Trumpian turn.
Not even close. Unlike trump and todays maga GOP, I believe there can be a plan whereas, they just want to shut it all down, ban anyone without white skin, target not only illegal aliens but legal ones to except for some white foreigners.
 
Country of almost 300 million people has no capacity to shelter few thousand legitimate refugees, of Muslim faith on the top of it?
It is a sad state of affairs indeed. It would be interesting to explore why Indonesia seems to inhospitable towards these refugees. Maybe they fear that if they let in 'just a couple of thousand', hundreds of thousands of Rohingya will come and seek asylum here (there are currently 1.2 million displaced Rohingya).
And they rally at the same here for "Liberate Palestine"? What if hypotheticaly Palestinians ask for asylum-they will be pushed back into the sea I suppose.
You do realize that a 'liberated Palestine' will be the best way to prevent any asylum seeking Palestinians on your doorstep? So, in a way it makes sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob
Till saturation is reached....Then it all goes to shit.
Yeah - this happened in Dublin (Ireland) last night. A naturalized Algerian immigrant stabbed a group of kids and their teacher outside their school and anti-immigrant protestors rioted.
We have huge issues in Ireland with housing - there is not enough and each year we have more people arriving and no houses for them to live in. We also took in 75,000+ Ukrainians which has unfortunately made a tight housing market into a housing crisis.
Its fodder for the far right wingers - and they are gathering a lot of support in poorer parts of Irish society as a result. Failed by the centre ground politicians.
 

Users who viewed this discussion (Total:0)

Follow Us

Latest Expat Indo Articles

Latest Tweets by Expat Indo

Latest Activity

New posts Latest threads

Online Now

Newest Members

Forum Statistics

Threads
6,674
Messages
112,826
Members
3,968
Latest member
riosan
Back
Top Bottom