Today a rather short session.
The topic was IT and the system used by the KPU. Jaswar Koto, who was called upon as expert witness, and who seems to be a professor computer programming and development in Japan, stated there have been consistent flaws in input. He mentioned 63 polling stations. Now, I wonder why you would need an IT expert to talk about inconsistent input? If there are mistakes made, that is very easy to check, but nobody seems to be able to show that proof, we are just supposed to take the word of a guy nobody ever heard of?
Talking about IT guys, another 'expert', Soegianto Soelistiono, claims he had developed a.....ahem robot ? Which analyzed the results and found major discrepancies. I guess he means he downloaded the KPU data to his Excel sheet?! Anyway, he claims team Prabowo dropped during the Ramadan period with 107.000 votes. If there is a daily count like we have seen from the KPU, it makes you wonder how somebody can state this while nobody else of all these thousands of spectators noticed? ?
Also, the architect of the security and backup was interrogated. He did not want to make any statements about input of course, but the access and security was optimal (three servers with constant backups) and unauthorized personnel did not have any access during all this time. [sic]