Source trust me broSource?
Source trust me broSource?
I can't tell anymore if your ignorance is enormous, or you are genuinely arguing in bad faith. This is so far from correct that you should either be laughed out of the 'building' or escorted out. And attempting to appear factual with your "check the numbers" comment. So, show me those number then!The biggest problem is that abortion has become the leading method of birth control, Check the numbers.
To be fair there was a little spike recently, but ya..I don't wanna get involved in this discussion.I can't tell anymore if your ignorance is enormous, or you are genuinely arguing in bad faith. This is so far from correct that you should either be laughed out of the 'building' or escorted out. And attempting to appear factual with your "check the numbers" comment. So, show me those number then!
Source link.
- ">99% of sexually experienced U.S. women aged 15–44 have used at least one contraceptive method as of 2008."
- "Among sexually active women who were not seeking pregnancy, 88% were using a contraceptive method in 2016, and this proportion has remained steady since 2002"
- "In 2018, 65% of U.S. women aged 15–49 were using a contraceptive method."
Source link.
- "The abortion rate in 2017 was 13.5 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44, down 8% from 14.6 per 1,000 in 2014. This is the lowest rate ever observed in the United States; in 1973, the year abortion became legal, the rate was 16.3."
- "At 2014 abortion rates, about one in four (24%) women will have an abortion by age 45."
To be fair there was a little spike recently, but ya..I don't wanna get involved in this discussion.![]()
Yeah without wanting to involve, I also think abortions instead of the pill and condoms is a "bit" over the top.Even if abortions went 10x, the numbers are still not even close. 65% versus under 2%.
I can't believe you would use the name Trump and organzied in the same sentence. Chaos I buy with Tump I buy, orgainzed anything not so much.
That idea would have been truer in the 1980's when the only significant group in the US opposed to abortion was Catholics.Religion or religious motives (forgot the word) beliefs should not be part of the constitution
Just because some Catholics disagree on it doesn't mean abortion should be banned for the whole country
I guess it's just that enormous. Tell me how you see these figures and come to another conclusion. Other than financial (which could be argued is still unwanted) here are the health, rape and incest numbers. Explain to me what I missed. The majority of abortions are done as birth control. Spin it how you want.I can't tell anymore if your ignorance is enormous, or you are genuinely arguing in bad faith. This is so far from correct that you should either be laughed out of the 'building' or escorted out. And attempting to appear factual with your "check the numbers" comment. So, show me those number then!
Source link.
- ">99% of sexually experienced U.S. women aged 15–44 have used at least one contraceptive method as of 2008."
- "Among sexually active women who were not seeking pregnancy, 88% were using a contraceptive method in 2016, and this proportion has remained steady since 2002"
- "In 2018, 65% of U.S. women aged 15–49 were using a contraceptive method."
Source link.
- "The abortion rate in 2017 was 13.5 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44, down 8% from 14.6 per 1,000 in 2014. This is the lowest rate ever observed in the United States; in 1973, the year abortion became legal, the rate was 16.3."
- "At 2014 abortion rates, about one in four (24%) women will have an abortion by age 45."
www.medicalnewstoday.com
abortion has become the leading method of birth control
The majority of abortions are done as birth control.
Then I made an error in the wording of my first statment. I think you well knew the intent and what point I was trying to make. I stand by the second statement in full which was the intent of my first one.Those are not at all the same thing.
Then I made an error in the wording of my first statment. I think you well knew the intent and what point I was trying to make. I stand by the second statement in full which was the intent of my first one.
The fist thing I am doing is firing my editor.Are you going to use your first amendment?
Or call a friend
Calm down....given power to women is a VERY BAD idea, see Von Der Leyen ....This a subject, that should be more in the hands of Women to decide! All these old Men and Women trying to control younger Women, that may be Poor, Abused, Beaten, Raped, is an outrage! The older people don't want to take, and raise these unwanted children! This World is far too overcrowded, already! I say give the Women of the World, more control with this Subject! We shouldn't be forcing overpopulation, due to Archaic Religious beliefs! It is a crime to force Women to give birth, and bring these unwanted children, into a world of Poverty, Hunger, Abuse, lack of Education!