It's astounding the number of people (and this thread is a good representation of the phenomenon) who just took the list of Tariffs imposed on the US by other countries from the Trump team, as face value. Even when the calculation is put in your face, you still don't understand.
Trade deficit percentage is NOT a tariffs.
And in what world does the US wants an equal trade balance with each country? It's ridiculous! The US is the biggest consumer market in the world, it will always have a trade deficit (on goods).
Let's look at Madagascar. The tariff the US imposed on them is 57 fucking percents. One of the poorest countries in the world! Boohoo, Madagascar ApPliEs 93% tArIfFs! UnFaIr!
Source:
https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/africa/madagascar
Indeed, $679 mill / $733 mill * 100 = 92.6% trade deficit. That's how they calculated this bullshit.
But let's look closer, shall we?
2024 US GDP: $29 Trillion (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_GDP)
2024 Madagascar GDP: $17 Billion (
https://www.worldeconomics.com/GrossDomesticProduct/Current-GDP/Madagascar.aspx)
2024 Madagascar exports to the US as percentage of its GDP: $733.2 Mill / $17 Bill * 100 = 4.3%. In other words, Madagascar exports to the US represent 4.3% of its GDP. Not huge but not insignificant.
2024 US exports to Madagascar as percentage of its GDP: $53.4 Mill / $29 Trillion = 0.000184%. In other words, US exports to Madagascar represent 0.000184% of its GDP. In other words, exports to the US are 427,000x more important to Madagascar's economy than exports to Madagascar are to the US economy.
So the US is bullying one of the poorest nations on earth for a trade value that has a negligible impact. And that's without counting the stop of USAID to the country.
Now, let's open the other can of worms of all the US sport apparel brands manufacturing in Cambodia, Vietnam, Bangladesh, etc. Maybe they should look in-ward a little? And what do they think will happen to the domestic prices of those goods when these brands have to pass onto the US consumers the cost of moving production to the US? It makes 0 sense.