Human Rights and Campus Rules

[Fred]

Atlantis, no worries. A nice pic of a pretty lady. No complaints from here at all!!

Another feminist.

 

[dafluff]

Moderation note: A picture that appeared in this thread was removed, as they violate our Posting Guidelines. We have also updated the Posting Guidelines to further clarify what is acceptable or not to post in these forums. You can read about the update here: https://forum.expatindo.org/threads/amendment-to-the-posting-guidelines.2754/#post-48151

If you wish to discuss this moderation decision, please start another thread. Do not derail this one.

 

[Fred]

Yeah...let's see if Fred gets by with this.

Seems not... I got a spanking ... and a whole new moderation guideline.
















so that's a bonus

 

[Puspawarna]

Brave man Fred...the last time I posted a picture of a sexy lady turning an aircraft prop to start the engine, so was doing something useful and not just posing, the Mods and the ladies on the forum became hysterically outraged and descended on me like I was some pornographer or misogynist.

I didn't know we had any ladies on this forum. Care to name them? (Hint: I'm definitely not a lady, so don't start with me.)

 

[Davita]

So did I, and posted it.
Whilst not porn, the question is one about how many ladies enjoy male attention that's based solely on sexual attraction, even encouraging it,
The political picture we're fed is all about women being against such things, but a large number of women post very sexy, semi porn pictures of themselves for random men to look at.
I went for a picture that suggested extremely sexy but avoided posting the many selfies showing a woman clearly making sure men knew she's game for bending over a washing machine on fast spin.

In the bad old days one of my household duties was to take our washing to the coin-operated laundromart. I saw many young ladies leaning against spinning machines and smiling...they were clearly enjoying the vibrations and getting into a quiver...and jiggling!
For me it just meant the end of the washing cycle and I'd need more coins to transfer the washing to the dryer....

 

[Fred]

It seems, so far at least, women's rights aren't a massive issue on this forum.
Too small a sample to draw any conclusions, but enough to encourage greater research into the possibility women's rights groups are not a lot more than a bunch of lesbians and frigid old hags who've never been with a man who was some good in the sack.

Returning to head coverings - I don't know of a single woman who objects to a headscarf, but I know schoolgirls who dislike wearing it as part of school uniform. I dislike full coverings but it's very possible a lot of women who wear them would feel they were naked without them.

Saudi, the country that seems to encourage more extreme forms of Islam in Indonesia, forces their use, and that clearly bad news. Saying that, it's their country so it's up to them to sort out.
Without knocking Saudis who export Wahhabi teachings, ideas foreign to Indonesia and Islam, they're a bunch of dicks. Dudes, this is Indonesia, a country where Islam is beautiful, so sod off interfering in religion and politics here.
Seriously for a moment, you can't fail to be impressed with Islam and the beautiful way Indonesian Muslims behave (in general), but foreign forces are trying to pervert Islam, and that's bad news for everyone.

 

[Puspawarna]

It seems, so far at least, women's rights aren't a massive issue on this forum.

You might be surprised. We've had a few choice discussions of gender-related matters here. You are new to the forum and don't have access to the cage, so perhaps you should avoid making generalizations about things you are understandably less than fully informed about.

Too small a sample to draw any conclusions, but enough to encourage greater research into the possibility women's rights groups are not a lot more than a bunch of lesbians and frigid old hags who've never been with a man who was some good in the sack.

What sample are you talking about? The women on this forum? You are right about that being a small group. There are a lot of reasons why this place doesn't attract many female posters, but charming remarks like yours are definitely part of it. I know this because I know a lot of women who never joined here or LIIF, and I've asked them about why.

As to the nature of this small sample, I'm not a lesbian, not that there is a damn thing wrong with that. I have been with men who were absolutely fabulous in bed. Anyway, there is logical lapse in the characterization "frigid old hags who've never been with a man who was some good in the sack." If they were frigid, it wouldn't matter if the guy were any good, now, would it? You should think these things through before you spew them.

I am an old hag, though. That part is true.

 

[Fred]

You should think these things through before you spew them.

But I'm a male chauvinist pig so it's very hard for me to consider much regarding those matters.

 

[IndoTom]

It seems, so far at least, women's rights aren't a massive issue on this forum.
Too small a sample to draw any conclusions, but enough to encourage greater research into the possibility women's rights groups are not a lot more than a bunch of lesbians and frigid old hags who've never been with a man who was some good in the sack.

Wow Fred, Be careful you don't end up crash landing in the middle of the Pacific and your bones lost for all time (aka Amelia Earhart) because of these comments. I can appreciate your candor even though it's a bit out of date (Austin Powers era), or maybe it was never fashionable. But sometimes it's nice to know who you can trust or not trust around your family in advance!

 

[Puspawarna]

But I'm a male chauvinist pig so it's very hard for me to consider much regarding those matters.

Oh, come now (no pun intended). Although "thinking with the wrong head" is a saying for a reason, I have complete faith that the male of the human species is capable of logical thought. Don't get trapped by outdated stereotypes! Throw off your chains and become a modern, freethinking individual.

 

[El_Goretto]

Oh, come now (no pun intended). Although "thinking with the wrong head" is a saying for a reason, I have complete faith that the male of the human species is capable of logical thought. Don't get trapped by outdated stereotypes! Throw off your chains and become a modern, freethinking individual.

Not a chance, it's so much easier to go for cheap boasts and show offs in front of the mates.

I was told when I was still an adolescent that those who speak the most about sex are those who get the least.

 

[Davita]

Not a chance, it's so much easier to go for cheap boasts and show offs in front of the mates.

I was told when I was still an adolescent that those who speak the most about sex are those who get the least.

Donald Trump seems to deny that myth. According to recent revelations he got plenty and he used to boast about it....but now has amnesia.
It must be an age thing as I also cannot remember. That's why I needed pictures to remind myself....and dafluff has gone and snipped them out.....

 

[Puspawarna]

Donald Trump seems to deny that myth. According to recent revelations he got plenty and he used to boast about it....but now has amnesia.

He does seem to defy the myth, doesn't he? However, I think he's the exception that proves the rule: because he is rich and famous, he can get women far more easily than a person with his looks and personality, but no money or fame, would be able to.

Remember those Howard Stern tapes that were played some during the campaign, in which he said lots of things that disparaged women? There was one comment he made that I thought was interesting, but I never heard anyone remark on it, so I'll remark on it now.

I am wildly paraphrasing here - the actual conversation was very different, I'm sure, except for the intent of the last line, which is accurate:

HOWARD STERN: Yeah, the ones that have big nipples, they're the best.
TRUMP: The man gets more pleasure with those chicks.
STERN: Maybe the woman does too!
TRUMP: Eh, who cares if the woman enjoys it?

I suppose the exchange was sufficiently graphic that no one in the national media wanted to run with it. But when I read that, I thought, "boy, he really is an ass! I've known men who were jerks, but still they were fairly gentlemanly in bed, if only because their pride was tied to making sure that the woman enjoyed a good romp with them. This guy Trump doesn't even give a s**t if the woman gets any satisfaction out of having sex with him - he is such a narcissist that he only cares about HIS pleasure."

 

[Fred]

It's easy to get women to go to bed with you if you're a billionaire.

 

[Fred]

throw off your chains and become a modern, freethinking individual.

I am free thinking, totally ignoring the politically correct version in favour of reality.
As for not getting any, I'm getting so little I think I'm a virgin again.