- Joined
- Jul 17, 2016
- Messages
- 2,510
The proposal that a no feed-back category upon which commercial vendors can post their products and services advertisements strikes me as an idea worth looking into -- sort of a long form version of ads that appear at the top of some forums or perhaps offer advertisers their own corner of the Expat Indo website.
That being said, what I hear you saying is that the "topic" of an advertiser's posts is to be very narrowly construed to exclude criticism of the advertiser, including calling attention to disingenuous and Shawn Spicer-ish responses to requests for information, in the case at hand for example, on pricing.
The example of Nigerian scam artists was used earlier as a point of comparison. I gather that criticism in that case is also not acceptable under "the guidelines we have set up for the classified forum [where] very simple: Absolutely no off topic posting [is] allowed..." The point being made was that blatantly, obviously dishonest ad copy slips in under the "absolutely no" rule because it is so obvious that even a senile senior with a compulsion to write checks to strangers would see the ad as a scam, thus pointing it out is unnecessary.
SO both clearly honest and clearly dishonest commercial postings are protected by the no criticism rule where criticism is by definition off topic, especially of the one-liner variety. For those, such as Basfana Ridan, in the in between area of marginal or suspected dishonesty, the absolute rule, according to this discussion, shields the advertiser as well.
I can live without out further off topic posts regarding my feelings about obviously disingenuous posting in the Goods and Services channel. Keeping criticism on topic in the manner employed by Van H (where an example was used to expose predatory pricing) seems to be acceptable. A bit more time consuming, but I can work with that.
I also retract and apologize for any suggestion impugning the motives of Defluff and any other members of the mod team. Heat of the moment thing to which I succumbed.
That being said, what I hear you saying is that the "topic" of an advertiser's posts is to be very narrowly construed to exclude criticism of the advertiser, including calling attention to disingenuous and Shawn Spicer-ish responses to requests for information, in the case at hand for example, on pricing.
The example of Nigerian scam artists was used earlier as a point of comparison. I gather that criticism in that case is also not acceptable under "the guidelines we have set up for the classified forum [where] very simple: Absolutely no off topic posting [is] allowed..." The point being made was that blatantly, obviously dishonest ad copy slips in under the "absolutely no" rule because it is so obvious that even a senile senior with a compulsion to write checks to strangers would see the ad as a scam, thus pointing it out is unnecessary.
SO both clearly honest and clearly dishonest commercial postings are protected by the no criticism rule where criticism is by definition off topic, especially of the one-liner variety. For those, such as Basfana Ridan, in the in between area of marginal or suspected dishonesty, the absolute rule, according to this discussion, shields the advertiser as well.
I can live without out further off topic posts regarding my feelings about obviously disingenuous posting in the Goods and Services channel. Keeping criticism on topic in the manner employed by Van H (where an example was used to expose predatory pricing) seems to be acceptable. A bit more time consuming, but I can work with that.
I also retract and apologize for any suggestion impugning the motives of Defluff and any other members of the mod team. Heat of the moment thing to which I succumbed.