You're joking I hope ?
Just ONE example.....
Primary efficacy analysis demonstrates BNT162b2 to be 95% effective against COVID-19 beginning 28 days after the first dose; 170 confirmed cases of COVID-19 were evaluated, with 162 observed in the placebo group versus 8 in the vaccine group Efficacy was consistent across age, gender, race and...
www.pfizer.com
- Primary efficacy analysis demonstrates BNT162b2 to be 95% effective against COVID-19 beginning 28 days after the first dose;170 confirmed cases of COVID-19 were evaluated, with 162 observed in the placebo group versus 8 in the vaccine group
- Efficacy was consistent across age, gender, race and ethnicity demographics; observed efficacy in adults over 65 years of age was over 94%
Woaw....95% efficacity.... and 94% over 65 y old ! And see the part I put in bold.
Many studies have now showed this to be completely wrong...
So, with now 1 year "experience" what is the REAL efficacity rate ?
Claiming 95% efficacity when everybody knows that a flu vaccine, tested and improved every year since 10 years has only 70% efficacity.....
What do you call that ?
Marketing tricks or manipulation ?