This is the point I was trying to make on another thread - without causing offence. Someone was trying to sell an as yet unbuilt tiny 2 bed (55m2) apartment that won't be completed until 2022 for around $300,000
I stated that I would find it extremely unlikely that they would even get anywhere near $1,000 if they could even find a tenant - lets assume that they did miraculously rent it for $12,000 a year (very unlikely)
Now work out the rental investment return / yield etc - they would have to rent it for 25 years + to get their initial investment back (I am excluding any capital increase for arguments sake) and again that is assuming they could rent it every month for 25 years at $1,000 exc any costs for s/c, maintenance, etc etc etc
In reality such an apartment in today's prices and market, a 55m2 2bed apartment, assuming you can even find a tenant you would happy to get 8jt or 10jt a month max.
So now tell me why would I as a bule spend / waste / invest $300,000 of my money to buy a property here with these sort of numbers
I would rather waste $1,000 a month on a big 2bed or a reasonable 3 bed and have the flexibility to walk away with a couple of months notice and have $300,000 safely in the bank (making me 8% a year - which pays for my rent anyway!) in case we all get kicked out next week
Do you understand the numbers now? Yes it is a messed up scenario and demonstration, but sadly it is true, Jakarta is a renter's marker, not an owners market. Every big block, old and new, has dozens and dozens of empty units. A smart owner will spend a few million, clean, paint, modernise, and then rent out at whatever they can get. Any income is better than no income.
Expats in Indonesia would very unlikely commit to investing a huge amount on buying a property unless they have family, wives, etc and usually they buy land and build their own property anyway
Other expats get rent paid by company sometimes
The rest of them / us really are not so bothered about the fancy bits, we need somewhere to sleep, we are at work 100 hours a week then either away for business or on holiday. Better to have a decent unit in an older block, nice refurbished etc than waste thousands to stay in e.g four seasons residence when you are only there to use the bedroom.
Sorry to ramble on but every week friends asking me why I rent and don't buy and they don't understand my logic
On top of which, my $300,000 in the bank is making me enough interest to cover my rent anyway easily, with some to spare AND I still have my cash there, in the bank, 24/7, liquid and available and untouchable should the sh1t hit the fan
If I did buy a property, there are so many scenarios with which later on I could lose it - change of ownership rules and such
It is just not worth the risk for me (personally) to buy a property on the offchance it will double in value in 10 years and then I can try and sell it like 1000's of other people
This is precisely what happened in Dubai - over supply saturated a non existant market. $300,000 for a 2bed?
If you live on your own, or just with a working partner, once you are inside your apartment, and everything works, and is clean and tidy and modern and fresh, you can just imagine you are in the 4 seasons if you really want.
Anyway my point was / is not to be offensive to the owners trying to sell properties, just curious about their thoughts and business strategy. My post was fairly deleted on the thread / post in question, ironically that was an agent posting, not even the owner, trying to sell units in a development not even started yet due to complete in 5 years
So again, if you had $300,000 cash would you really buy a 55m2 2bed unit or would you keep it in the bank, get 8% a year interest ($24,000 a year) and rent a lovely 2bed for $12-15,000 a year instead and STILL have money left and STILL have your $300,000 in the bank?
Where is the logic?
Curhat finished. Lol