Indonesia doesn't have a Gift Tax nor Inheritance Tax nor a Wealth Tax.
Pasal 4 ayat (1) huruf d angka 4 UU PPh nomor 36 Tahun 2008.
Pasal 4
(1) Yang menjadi objek pajak adalah penghasilan, yaitu setiap tambahan kemampuan ekonomis yang diterima atau diperoleh Wajib Pajak, baik yang berasal dari Indonesia maupun dari luar Indonesia, yang dapat dipakai untuk konsumsi atau untuk menambah kekayaan Wajib Pajak yang bersangkutan, dengan nama dan dalam bentuk apa pun, termasuk:
4. keuntungan karena pengalihan harta berupa hibah, bantuan, atau sumbangan, kecuali yang diberikan kepada keluarga sedarah dalam garis keturunan lurus satu derajat....etc etc.

Re: post #123 by Dafluff
Thank you as it seems you are correct...I have the gov't translate of amendment 36 of 2008 to UU 7 of 1983.....
It does state that only gifts from one degree of lineal descent are excluded.
I was relying on information from websites like the one from ....
http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Worldwide-Estate-and-Inheritance-Tax-Guide-2015/$FILE/Worldwide%20Estate%20and%20Inheritance%20Tax%
Which categorically states on page 146/147 that Indonesia has NO Gift Tax, Inheritance Tax or Wealth Tax.
and ASEAN BRIEFING which states.....
RELATED: Dezan Shira & Associates’ Tax and Compliance Services
Indonesia:
Indonesia does not levy inheritance tax. As long as there is no business or employment relationship, there is also no gift tax.
My wife is so anxious and stressed that we are proceeding with creating amnesty for her nephew so all's well...it's only money...![]()
Yep, as always, accurate information on just about anything in Indonesia is elusive...even when asking supposed professionals.
Since the inception of the national tax amnesty program, the Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) has been mentioned by many parties as an instrument that can end global tax evasion. By having the AEOI mechanism in place, tax dodgers will no longer have a place to hide. That is the idea.
What is the AEOI actually? The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) describes the AEOI as a systematic and periodic transfer of taxpayers’ information from source countries to their residence countries. A source country is a country where a taxpayer receives income such as dividends, interest and others.
He's probably just pushing the tax amnesty as he is told to do. Right now, the finance ministry is pushing really hard to meet targets as they have barely met 30% or so.
As an aside, I spoke to a long time friend who is a tax consultant. He told me that one of his clients, one of the biggest business family locally (think kids driving around in Lambos), paid approx Rp 500rb in tax last year. Their previous accountant even used the "Sangat Sederhana" tax form, which is the simplest form, for people making less than Rp 60 million. Now they are going to do the amnesty. This is by far the norm in Indonesia, so I think your AR just couldn't comprehend somebody actually paying their correct tax amount.
Kalla Group owned by the Vice President has enrolled for tax amnesty, his brother-in-law's Bosowa Group also joined. Does that mean they were not paying the correct tax amount all along?
Kalla Group owned by the Vice President has enrolled for tax amnesty, his brother-in-law's Bosowa Group also joined. Does that mean they were not paying the correct tax amount all along?
The Indonesian government needs a new strategy to revive its much-lauded tax amnesty program, which has been performing poorly in its second phase
incidents such as the anti-Ahok protest in Jakarta and the church bombing in Samarinda have made taxpayers hesitant in joining the tax amnesty program as they now think twice about keeping their assets in the country for the next three years
I don't think you can blame the anti Ahok rally nor the church bombing. The second phase of the tax amnisty was reported early on before these actions of failing to get people involved but for the same reason. A lack of trust.
With regard to repatriation from overseas I'd agree with FP17.
The principle reason for tax amnesty was to get those funds into RI to fund the investments in infrastructure etc. There is no doubt that part has failed in its objective. The by-product, which was not the main principle, is that many Indonesians who had NOT previously paid taxes on income saw a good way to avoid future criminal charge....and took the amnesty. Extra to this is those people are now registered for taxation, in the future, so that has been successful.
Gov't itself has to blame for not securing those overseas investors "or crooks" to trust that the system will not harm them...this needs to be addressed.
The question is of course when ASEAN will collaborate on this, and require banks to provide information to tax authorities on nationals of other member states...
[As they do in the EU now; the tax department of a country (can) know(s) which properties and bank accounts you have abroad]