Law enforcement agencies, governmental bodies such as the Home Office, and agencies responsible for national security have long held personal and biometric data including fingerprints, blood types, and eye colour, height, etc. The level of security surrounding this data remains irrelevant, as it is an unavoidable aspect of living in society. Alternatively, the only other option would be to live in the jungle.The main thing to understand is that using a cellphone, your biometric data is not stored or transmitted to anyone. Everything stays on the device and the information is basically converted to a key. An image of your face is not stored, nor is an image of your fingerprints. The data is used to make a key, that's it. It either matches or it doesn't based on the datapoints, not an actual image.
Also, if you travel to foreign countires, a lot of them will fingerprint you and store the actual fingerprints that can be shared with anyone world wide. How secure do you think their information really is?
However, generally speaking, such agencies are perceived as more secure due to their full accountability and the requirement for compensation in the event of system failures or misused.
When individuals have no alternative, such considerations are irrelevant in decision-making. However, for banks and fintech companies, numerous alternatives exist. Also, it is common sense that storing such data across multiple devices increases the risk of getting stolen. Mobile devices and phones are easily lost, particularly in public places.
Last edited:
