War

[Dave70]

How convenient it is to have omitted to say it in full as in "Macgregor, who served as a senior advisor under Trump"?

If I talk of someone, is it not enough to say what his position was? Do I have to add “under Trump” or “under Obama” or “under Bush”?

Is he also one of your mavericks of US politics?

He’s not mavericks of US politics because he’s not a politician, at least not yet. But he’s a well-known maverick in the military establishment. Source: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/pentagon/interviews/

So yes, you are correct in a way: he's not another “Putin Apologist” or “Russian Propagandist”. Just worse than that.

What’s worse than that? A traitor? Just because his views are contrary to mainstream thought?

The fact that you dare stating "honest opinion" when a guy who has multiplied anti semitic remarks over the years, speaks about a Jew (Zelenskyy) is beyond me.

If it’s not his “honest opinion”, is it his “dishonest opinion”? Is he ruining his own reputation by talking nonsense? If he's anti-Semite as you say, then no wonder he said "Zelenskyy is a puppet". Did you see that you are contradicting yourself?

To me, his opinion carries weight, especially on military perspective.

MacGregor: Washington wants war to continue as long as possible in hopes to overthrow Putin

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2022/03/16/macgregor_washington_wants_war_to_continue_as_long_as_possible_in_hopes_to_overthrown_putin.amp.html

 

[Bad_azz]

To me, his opinion carries weight, especially on military perspective.

You made your bigoted and barely educated opinions quite clear & now I want to quote John Sweeney...
but I shall let you figure his 'line ' out for yourself.

 

[atlantis]

What’s worse than that? A traitor? Just because his views are contrary to mainstream thought?

Using the stinking anti jews rhetoric of Stalin and Hitler ("rootless cosmopolitan") is worse than being a simple (minded) Putin apologist.

 

[atlantis]

If it’s not his “honest opinion”, is it his “dishonest opinion”? Is he ruining his own reputation by talking nonsense? If he's anti-Semite as you say, then no wonder he said "Zelenskyy is a puppet". Did you see that you are contradicting yourself?

You don't get sarcasm, do you?

 

[Dave70]

You don't get sarcasm, do you?

Problem is, I do believe he IS a puppet. And not sure yet if MacGregor is indeed anti-Semite.

 

[Dave70]

Tulsi Gabbard is now censored on YouTube.

CENSORED: This is what Google/YouTube does not want you to see

Censored: YouTube/Google are offended by my criticism of the Military Industrial Complex and my advocacy for negotiated settlement in Ukraine, because they are the social media arm of that warmongerin

rumble.com

On Twitter (video uploaded to YouTube), she talked about "democracy" in Ukraine.

 

[Nimbus]

Tulsi Gabbard is now censored on YouTube.

CENSORED: This is what Google/YouTube does not want you to see

Censored: YouTube/Google are offended by my criticism of the Military Industrial Complex and my advocacy for negotiated settlement in Ukraine, because they are the social media arm of that warmongerin

rumble.com

On Twitter (video uploaded to YouTube), she talked about "democracy" in Ukraine.

Youtube is a private company, and is not obliged to give time to fake news sources like Trump, and now Gabbard. They don’t tolerate porn either, while it’s still freely available in USA through other legal channels.

It is not good that Zelenskyy banned 3 tv channels, but since they are pro-Russia it’s understandable in light of the situation in Crimea and Donbas. Of course you purposely leave out the part about Russian support for those stations.

Ukraine bans pro-Russian TV stations – DW – 02/03/2021

Ukraine's pro-Western president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, has signed decrees banning pro-Russian media outlets. The broadcasters had their licences revoked and are set to stay off the air for the next five years.

m.dw.com

I suppose Germany “is not a democracy” either for prohibiting nazis and holocaust denials. What an offense to free speech.

 

[atlantis]

It is not good that Zelenskyy banned 3 tv channels, but since they are pro-Russia it’s understandable in light of the situation in Crimea and Donbas. Of course you purposely leave out the part about Russian support for those stations.

Ukraine bans pro-Russian TV stations – DW – 02/03/2021

Ukraine's pro-Western president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, has signed decrees banning pro-Russian media outlets. The broadcasters had their licences revoked and are set to stay off the air for the next five years.

m.dw.com

I suppose Germany “is not a democracy” either for prohibiting nazis and holocaust denials. What an offense to free speech

Thanks to Tulsi Garbage I woke up and realized that EU aren't democracies either. At day 2 of the Russian agression EU banned Sputnik and Russia today.

Fortunately Sputnik @Dave70 can still broadcast their propaganda on Expatindo.

 

[harryopal1]

Trying to reason with Dave70 is hitting your head against an ideological wall. His comments do offer insight into "correct thinking" about Russia from a Chinese perspective.

P.S. Dave, please do not respond. Further discussion with you is frustrating and a complete waste of time.

 

[Nimbus]

My employer is raising funds through an internal site for the Red Cross, to be used in Ukraine. The response from some of the Chinese colleagues are… interesting. One guy sarcastically said it’s great, then asked us to also set up donations for Afghanistan, Iraq, and Panama. You know where this is going. I said why limit it to those countries, let’s help Tibet too.

 

[fastpitch17]

My employer is raising funds through an internal site for the Red Cross, to be used in Ukraine. The response from some of the Chinese colleagues are… interesting. One guy sarcastically said it’s great, then asked us to also set up donations for Afghanistan, Iraq, and Panama. You know where this is going. I said why limit it to those countries, let’s help Tibet too.

You should mention Taiwan too to help with their defense for their nation.

 

[fastpitch17]

On Tucker Carlson (the stooge featured on russian propaganda tv) if anyone wants to know more about this claimed great American military know it all. Douglas MacGregor, Russia won. Even before it started, russia won.

MSN

Fox News' Invasion Expert Is a Trump-Appointed Putin Propagandist Who Thinks Russia Is Being 'Too Gentle'

Tucker Carlson, who has bashed Russia's invasion of Ukraine, invited Douglas Macgregor on his Fox News show to push Putin propaganda.

www.rollingstone.com

 

[Dave70]

Fortunately Sputnik @Dave70 can still broadcast their propaganda on Expatindo.

Thank God you aren't another 'Stan Grant'. Nevertheless, I don't see all of Sputnik and RT News as propaganda. Same on the Western media, some are propaganda, some are not. Does that mean you will allow me to post links to Russian or Chinese media?

 

[Dave70]

My employer is raising funds through an internal site for the Red Cross, to be used in Ukraine. The response from some of the Chinese colleagues are… interesting. One guy sarcastically said it’s great, then asked us to also set up donations for Afghanistan, Iraq, and Panama. You know where this is going. I said why limit it to those countries, let’s help Tibet too.

There is NO war or famine in Tibet, so it is ridiculous and ignorant (sorry to say) to suggest "let's help Tibet too".

For your information, China is sending aid for Ukraine through the Red Cross. Not weapons or bullets.

China is also sending aid to Afghanistan as there is famine and extreme poverty there. Unlike the USA which is "stealing" 3+ billion dollars of Afghan's fund when none of the 911 terrorists were Afghans.

 

[Nimbus]

You should mention Taiwan too to help with their defense for their nation.

Taiwan hasn’t been invaded, but Tibet has.

Their mindset is dangerous, it’s the same mindset of Japan before WWII. They see America invading countries with impunity, and are indignant that they’re not afforded the same privilege. We know how this ended up.

To some degree they have a point, and this is why I hate Bush and his Neocons so much. America is being hypocritical when she criticizes unjustified invasions.

 

[Nimbus]

Thank God you aren't another 'Stan Grant'. Nevertheless, I don't see all of Sputnik and RT News as propaganda. Same on the Western media, some are propaganda, some are not. Does that mean you will allow me to post links to Russian or Chinese media?

And this is the gist of the argument by propagandists. Because nobody is perfect, then everybody is equally bad. Mother Theresa is not perfect, Joseph Stalin is not perfect either, therefore they’re equally bad.

Western media is not perfect because each reporter still has personal bias, therefore they’re no different than RT where 100% of the news is never critical of Putin and Russia.

Because everybody is equally bad and perfectly true information is not possible, then this guy and his kind want people to believe whoever they like.

 

[Nimbus]

There is NO war or famine in Tibet, so it is ridiculous and ignorant (sorry to say) to suggest "let's help Tibet too".

For your information, China is sending aid for Ukraine through the Red Cross. Not weapons or bullets.

China is also sending aid to Afghanistan as there is famine and extreme poverty there. Unlike the USA which is "stealing" 3+ billion dollars of Afghan's fund when none of the 911 terrorists were Afghans.

There is no longer a war in Tibet because they had been thoroughly defeated. If people sent weapons to Tibetans like they do to Ukrainians, the result could have been different.

That Chinese guy was just being snarky by mentioning Panama, because the country is doing ok today and doesn’t need any aid either.

It’s fun to mention Tibet though. CCP-indoctrinated Chinese like to troll America as imperialists while excusing Russians for doing the same. Tibet proves that China is no better.

 

[Dave70]

Western media is not perfect because each reporter still has personal bias, therefore they’re no different than RT where 100% of the news is never critical of Putin and Russia.

Not only personal bias, ever heard of Presstitutes and the CIA controlling the narrative?

 

[Dave70]

There is no longer a war in Tibet because they had been thoroughly defeated. If people sent weapons to Tibetans like they do to Ukrainians, the result could have been different.

Last time Tibet was a "country" was around 1206. It was a kingdom at the time and was later conquered by the Mongols, it became Chinese territory since then. Then of course there was that one time when they declared independence in the midst of the Chinese Civil War, but no country recognized them as such, not even the League of Nations or the UN.

Therefore, how can it be an invasion when Tibet was never recognized as a country?

 

[Nimbus]

Not only personal bias, ever heard of Presstitutes and the CIA controlling the narrative?

Like I said, western media is not perfect, but it’s far, far more objective in most cases than CCP-controlled media behind the Great Firewall.