The number of indigenous University graduates was very small. That is probably one of the causes Indonesia lagging the world development until these days, with education system at the bottom of the civilized countries measuring education (PISA etc).
Entering the favourable state universities in Indonesia via standard entry examination is actually exceptionally challenging. Typically it is only very exceptional and talented students will gain entry. One could draw comparisons to the difficulty of gaining admission to prestigious institutions in asia like IIT (Indian Institute of Technology) in India or Tsinghua or Beijing University in China.
In countries in Europe like Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Sweden, Finland, etc., universities are normally state-funded. The staffs, professors salaries, building, teaching and research faculties are all funded by the state and/or donations. Getting funding from the state, they do not collect money from the student. Typically, it is only exceptional student with remarkable high School, A-Level grade/result could study at the universities with free tuition fees. The taxpayers / states get their money back as these highly competitive individuals will normally end up in high paying job which in return will pay high amount of tax or working in the profession that mostly needed by the society such as doctors, dentists, engineers, scientists, teachers, professors, etc.
In Indonesia, there's been a trend towards admission the so called the non-subsidized route. Nowadays, even students with lack of talent, intelligent who cannot pass the standard entrance examinations can still gain entry to favoured state universities and programs through non-traditional means, primarily through a special route:
MONEY.
Ingin mendaftar jalur mandiri di PTN pilihanmu? Cek mana saja PTN yang punya kuota jalur mandiri 2023 sampai 50 persen.
www.kompas.com
In 2023, it's estimated that 50% of students enrolled at state universities using this non-standard, non-subsidized route. Even lesser-known state universities in small cities are demanding substantial sums, often
in the hundreds of millions of rupiah, for sought-after courses such as medicine, dentistry, and engineering, IT. A few hundred millions of rupiah is just development fund alone. In the top of that the students in the non subsidised route will still need to pay millions of rupiahs every semester tuition fees, remarkably much higher then the non-standard route. As a matter of comparison how fars this collected money could go in Indonesia; reasonable number of highly ranked private universities in Indonesia are charging tuition fees less than these state funded universities, yet they still survive and produce quality graduate. Many of these private university graduates could still compete with graduate from state universities. Private universities need to survive on their own as they need to pay their staffs, professors, funding their own teaching and research universities. They get funding assistance from the state and donations in a few occasion, but it is very limited funding, the major universities running cost e.g salaries and pensions of the the staffs/professors are still paid from the money collected via tuition fees.
This money collected by state universities is often labelled as development funding for universities. However, it's frequently treated as their own money once collected, ending up being distributed among staff to top up salaries.
In Indonesia, as usual they tend to cherry pick by adopting the selective aspects of these funding models when it suits them while disregarding others. State universities in Indonesia are primarily state-funded, meaning administrative staffs, professors, and other employees are civil servants paid by the state. Also because they are civil servants their salaries and pensions are paid by the states (not by the universities). Civil servants in Indonesia get generous pension (by Indonesian standard) paid by the states. Teaching and research Facilities, buildings, and land, laboratories are all already funded and provided by the states/ taxpayers, similar funding model to state universities in Europe.
What distinguishes Indonesian state universities is their continued direct collection of substantial sums of money (could be a few hundred millions rupiahs) from students who don't pass the standard entrance exams, known as the non-subsidized route which accounting for 50% of admissions. This collected money often ends up in the hands of top management, such as vice chancellors, rectors, deans while the rest are distributed among staffs to top up salaries.
Collecting tuition fees directly is not uncommon for top private universities around the world. But they are private universities while in Indonesia they are state universities where vast majorities of the staffs are civil servants. For private universities, they are required to secure funding by their own to pay staff, professors salaries/pensions providing their own facilities, etc. If they can not secure funding, can not compete, mismanage the funds, allow the development fund to be corrupted in a large scale, they will not survive and will extinct. Many top universities worldwide are private and rely on the tuition fees, to pay staffs, professors, teaching and research facilities. They might also get donations, grants to build facilities, to provide scholarship for bright but disadvantage students.
In Indonesia while all of the staffs, professors are civil servants getting paid by the states, teaching and research facilities are all provided and funded by the state but they keep collecting money to admit students via non standard who are not capable to compete in the standard entry examination. As it is a direct collection there will be less accountability. This money is frequently ending up to be distributed among the staffs, to top up salaries rather than as initially intended for development. Also this non standard route might contribute the quality of doctors, that quite often highlight in the news where many of them getting mocked by the foreign doctor's in reputable hospitals in neighbouring countries such as in Singapore for misdiagnose.
Numerous instances of this have been reported in the news, and here are a few examples:
Rektor non-aktif Unud Bali, I Nyoman Gde Antara, divonis bebas dalam kasus korupsi dana SPI mahasiswa baru jalur mandiri tahun akademik 2018-2022.
denpasar.kompas.com
Seorang terpidana kasus korupsi penerimaan mahasiswa baru Universitas Lampung (Unila), Prof Heriyandi, meninggal dunia.
news.detik.com
Baca berita terbaru tentang korupsi-perguruan-tinggi di sini. Informasi terkini seputar korupsi-perguruan-tinggi yang akurat dan terpercaya.
koran.tempo.co