As long as she has blue eyes, right?If I am paying from my own pocket, I will typically go for the least expensive option.
As long as she has blue eyes, right?If I am paying from my own pocket, I will typically go for the least expensive option.
Well, You typically have no way of knowing who will be piloting your next flight. But if that information were available and the ticket price remained the same or similar, I would choose a pilot with a strong safety record.As long as she has blue eyes, right?
I get that but spending hours with a sub standard crew giving sub standard service on a sub standard plane isn't a good value.If I am paying from my own pocket, I will typically go for the least expensive option.
...a sub standard crew ...on a sub standard plane

What's long hard and full of seamen
What this documentary did not mention is that other privately owned domestic airlines operating routes within Indonesia and to neighbouring countries do not receive state funding injection, yet they are still able to compete effectively with Garuda Indonesia and Citilink and profitable. Examples include Lion Air, Batik Air, Wings Air, and Super Air Jet. In addition, low-cost carriers from neighbouring countries, such as AirAsia, operate under similar conditions with Garuda, City Link.Another interesting video. The comment section is good also....
The link has been posted on post #25
Nope, it's exactly the same I posted earlier.....Ok well now it's the latest version.
What this documentary did not mention is that other privately owned domestic airlines operating routes within Indonesia and to neighbouring countries do not receive state funding injection, yet they are still able to compete effectively with Garuda Indonesia and Citilink and profitable. Examples include Lion Air, Batik Air, Wings Air, and Super Air Jet. In addition, low-cost carriers from neighbouring countries, such as AirAsia, operate under similar conditions with Garuda, City Link.
That video seems a little sensationalistic. The claim that GA had half their fleet in heavy maintenance at one time is difficult to take at face value. It may be that half their fleet was in (not so heavy) maintenance or storage, which isn't the same. It would be very irregular to have more than a relatively few aircraft in calendar check at the same time. That's not to say that they're not in a bind; they certainly are.Another interesting video. The comment section is good also....
Of course those four examples of privately owned airlines, which are all effectively one company, have their own means of playing the system to their benefit. Whether they're profitable or not is a matter of conjecture, Air Asia Indonesia is a majority Indonesian company btw.What this documentary did not mention is that other privately owned domestic airlines operating routes within Indonesia and to neighbouring countries do not receive state funding injection, yet they are still able to compete effectively with Garuda Indonesia and Citilink and profitable. Examples include Lion Air, Batik Air, Wings Air, and Super Air Jet. In addition, low-cost carriers from neighbouring countries, such as AirAsia, operate under similar conditions with Garuda, City Link.
Like other national flag carriers flying internationally to regions such as the Middle East, Europe, the United States, and Australia, they are exposed to the same market environment, yet many of them remain profitable.
Another point not addressed is that Garuda Indonesia is one of the most corrupt state-owned enterprises in Indonesia.