Garuda Indonesia trapped in a relentless financial tailspin

As long as she has blue eyes, right?
Well, You typically have no way of knowing who will be piloting your next flight. But if that information were available and the ticket price remained the same or similar, I would choose a pilot with a strong safety record.

Some early research suggests that having blue eyes might provide a slight advantage for pilots for long haul which will typically deal with low light conditions (still debatable). Because blue eyes contain less melanin in the iris, they may allow more light to enter the eye, which could improve vision in dim or twilight environments

Also study shows female pilot female (Still debatable) will typically react better than male in high-pressure scenarios, displaying better situational awareness and consistent decision-making, while male pilots are more risk taker.

Did you say 'hi' to the lady :love::love::love:
 
Another interesting video. The comment section is good also....

What this documentary did not mention is that other privately owned domestic airlines operating routes within Indonesia and to neighbouring countries do not receive state funding injection, yet they are still able to compete effectively with Garuda Indonesia and Citilink and profitable. Examples include Lion Air, Batik Air, Wings Air, and Super Air Jet. In addition, low-cost carriers from neighbouring countries, such as AirAsia, operate under similar conditions with Garuda, City Link.

Like other national flag carriers flying internationally to regions such as the Middle East, Europe, the United States, and Australia, they are exposed to the same market environment, yet many of them remain profitable.

Another point not addressed is that Garuda Indonesia is one of the most corrupt state-owned enterprises in Indonesia.
 
Last edited:
What this documentary did not mention is that other privately owned domestic airlines operating routes within Indonesia and to neighbouring countries do not receive state funding injection, yet they are still able to compete effectively with Garuda Indonesia and Citilink and profitable. Examples include Lion Air, Batik Air, Wings Air, and Super Air Jet. In addition, low-cost carriers from neighbouring countries, such as AirAsia, operate under similar conditions with Garuda, City Link.

Obviously the Indonesian market is in fact a duopoly (oligopoly with two players). Both, Garuda and the Lion Group have approx. 1/2 of that market, give or take 2%.

So then the problem is also that the prices are kept very high, the upper area of the bandwidth that the government allows. And just let’s cancel some flights, the prices will make up for that. If both players apply that logic the consumer is screwed.
 
My friend booked SG DPS on garuda economy the other day for 4jt one way. MH in BUSINESS class from KL to JAK is 3jt only inc lounge access. Full hot email with wine etc. Crazy
 

Follow Us

Latest Expat Indo Articles

Latest Tweets by Expat Indo

Latest Activity

New posts Latest threads

Online Now

No members online now.

Newest Members

Forum Statistics

Threads
6,605
Messages
111,125
Members
3,885
Latest member
stucco8
Back
Top Bottom