Maybe the families of the soldiers who were killed fighting ISIS will be complaining as well
probably as much as the ISIS fighters that were killed by the Russians. War sucks. No doubt about it. You can't bring them back so you show your remorse, fix the problem, and go on. Knowing the US, all those families will be paid well for their loss. It may not return the loved ones but it's more them anyone else would do.
.
I'm getting a bit fed up by all these statements immediately after these attacks that it is "not terrorism". The same in Europe after these 'lone wolves' attacks. Often they give it some kind of 'the person had personal issues' twist. (Unhappy marriage, criminal past, lonely childhood, ...) And by which organization or recent events are those people influenced?
Even if there is no clear political aim or no organization behind it, what would you call bombing a place trying to make as many casualties as possible, with some kind of pressure cooker with nails etc.?
Wow another bomb going off - I wonder who could've been behind that - probably those Christian and Jews I reckon.
No need to go "that far" in time. The recent Rohyngia refugee crisis didn't show buddhist monks and buddhist activists of the 969 movement as being necessarily peaceful and beyond reproach. The 1997 anti Muslim riots in Mandalay, followed 3 or 4 years later by those of Taungoo and the multiple recent massacre of the Rohyngia in Central and Eastern Burma shows that Buddhist extremists may be the same breed of nutcases than those of any other religion.A violent Buddhist? That's an aberration, and yet... The Khmer Rouge utilized Buddhism's teachings on karma to excuse their actions. Clearly it was that person's karma to die, they would argue, fatalism..
I bet he was not radicalized but just sad and angry with the world because his fiancée broke up with him.

There is some suggestions that the bomber may have been radicalized by the wife he acquired while in Afghanistan. Sound familiar?