The treatment of Rohingya refugees by the Indonesian people and government can be observed through this video link.
Contrasting this with situation in other countries mainly in Europe.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...otels-Home-Office-costs-housing-8million.html Boat migrants must be booked in three-star hotels at least, Home Office tells contractors as costs of housing them soars to £8m a day
It's noteworthy that these migrants have been attempting to cross the Channel from Calais in France to Dover in the UK for an extended period. EU rules stipulate that all genuine refugees must claim asylum in the first safe country they reach. The argument is presented that if they were true refugees facing life-threatening situations, they could have sought asylum in the first country they reached.
The significant daily cost of £8 million prompts consideration of how many refugees, such as Rohingya refugees and those facing hunger in Africa, could have been assisted with that sum. Additionally, there are still benefit money provided for each family member, as well as coverage for healthcare, education, and other associated expenses, all of which are paid by the taxpayers.
The treatment Rohingya's refugees have received in Indonesia is astonishing. There must be a compelling reason that compels them to escape, arriving in one of the most inhospitable places to seek refuge, given the absence of benefits, social security, and free health care provided by the Indonesian government. There is minimal assistance and funding allocated to them, apart from what is provided by the UNHCR. They are victims of others who may be exploiting the system, using human rights as a shield.
Contrasting this with situation in other countries mainly in Europe.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...otels-Home-Office-costs-housing-8million.html Boat migrants must be booked in three-star hotels at least, Home Office tells contractors as costs of housing them soars to £8m a day
It's noteworthy that these migrants have been attempting to cross the Channel from Calais in France to Dover in the UK for an extended period. EU rules stipulate that all genuine refugees must claim asylum in the first safe country they reach. The argument is presented that if they were true refugees facing life-threatening situations, they could have sought asylum in the first country they reached.
The significant daily cost of £8 million prompts consideration of how many refugees, such as Rohingya refugees and those facing hunger in Africa, could have been assisted with that sum. Additionally, there are still benefit money provided for each family member, as well as coverage for healthcare, education, and other associated expenses, all of which are paid by the taxpayers.
The treatment Rohingya's refugees have received in Indonesia is astonishing. There must be a compelling reason that compels them to escape, arriving in one of the most inhospitable places to seek refuge, given the absence of benefits, social security, and free health care provided by the Indonesian government. There is minimal assistance and funding allocated to them, apart from what is provided by the UNHCR. They are victims of others who may be exploiting the system, using human rights as a shield.
Last edited:
