I don't really much care who the media outlet is except for the far right ones which I refuse to access. I lean more on particular interviews and substance presented. My television viewing is limited and limited in Indonesia.i do watch some CNN because there are a few that are not afraid to ask hard questiins of those they interview. I think overall their international feed is better than the strickly US one. I watch a little FOX but I have to limit that to their News people and never their opinion people. I have no problem with switching over to a French, German, Australian, Japanese, or even Al Jereeza to get some confirmation or different views in things. As for networks, I need to access them on line as I do other media such as writen.
Sure, some at CNN definately lean towards an agenda that yells progressive far left and I try to avoid them. I like the fact that CNN is willing to spend the money and put reporters around the world to give viewers first hand looks and early breaking news. Most times though, one hour and after that it is rehash. As far as Cuomo, I think I have seennsnippits of maybe 2 ir 3 of his shows. Never impressed and he had an agenda to suit himself. I they gave his time slot to someone like Briana Keiler, I would probably tune in sin e she is a no nonsense interviewer and reporter. She does side with military personnel being that she is a military family but she doesn't give military brass a pass.
I seen WaPo has put out an AI done list of media who have been possitive or negative in the past years. Evidently full of Excel like spread sheets for those so inclined to go through those things.
As for the NY Times not being what they once were, you could say the same for most print media. Fist came television and the likes of Walter Cronkite, the most trusted man in America and then along comes the internet. People were no longer getting their news feom print and fell into the sound bite craze pit. People for the most part no longer wanted to read the entire story when they got all they wanted to hear in a fe seconds of broadcasting. Unfortunate but is is the way of print media. Many of the TV type media now have incorporated articles and full reporting on their web sites. Instead of getting a shortened video to fit with programming, ine can actually read a full transcript of what is being reported on. Add information many times.
News media is a conduet between an event and the masses. That is all. That is all they should be. So called news personalities should be eliminated and news should just report in whole what the masses do not experience personally. If anyone is to form an opinion, it should be the masses who receive the raw information. No one telling them what they should think and no one spinning reports to point the viewers in a particular heading. Will we ever get that, no way. Never. So, it is up to the masses to use their brains to weed through what is being presented. Unfortunantly, so many are today formatted to only take in what they have been fed to believe and not worry about facts that tell them they are wrong no matter where those viewers may lay. I like to think that for the most part, I can still firmulate a decision in things with weighing the pros and cons. My brain may be old but still usable. If I form an opinion and simeone disagrees, change my mind but they have to do it with presenting reliable facts and saying this news service or that reported it just won't fly.