If it were a disease like Ebola that kills 50% of those infected, this would be the only option. But, like
@harryopal also just said, "want to end this thing" is a very different calculation for a disease that kills 0.5-2%. Presidents, governors, and health ministers worldwide are in a terrible position to consider the balance between health and economic, supply chain, and other opposing forces,
especially in less developed countries like Indonesia with less government resources, the average citizen having no savings, and a populace already 'comfortable' with regular deaths from preventable diseases and accidents.