It’s a blog on some peta website that claims some officials have said they’d support a ban, for all we know that official is a secretary, that hardly constitutes a directive by the Indonesian government. Is this blog collaborated anywhere by official government writing?
You say you support the ban, that’s what I’m indicating. You could also say you support an alternative way, but you didn’t, you personally want an outright ban.
Feel free to hit thay wall extra hard, seems you’ve got a lot of boiled up frustration to let out.
https://www.smh.com.au/environment/...t-trade-in-surprise-move-20180806-p4zvqk.html
At an extraordinary meeting between Indonesia’s
Ministry of Agriculture and the
Dog Meat Free Indonesia coalition, government officials announced they would
support a ban on the trade in, and deny veterinary certification for, dog and cat meat.
Leading veterinary
public officials - including Dr Syamsul Ma’arif, Dr Hastho Yuliadi, Dr Yadi Cahyadi and Dr Wiwiek Bagj - confirmed the dog-meat trade was
a serious public health threat, a significant animal welfare issue and a substantial problem for Indonesia’s growing tourism industry
The dog- and cat-meat trades currently operate in breach of
existing Indonesian laws that are intended to safeguard public health and safety, as well as rules to protect animals from cruelty, the coalition said.
a few points:
1) These are Indonesian
government officials, and they have spoken out i
n support of the ban, according to not just the INternational Humane Society, but reported by
major news outlets such as SMH.
2) It does not have to be an active proposal or bill in Parliament , to mean that
it has been proposed by members of the Indonesian national government, and for me to say that
I am supporting an initiative by INDONESIANS to enact such a ban.
3) The fact that there are existing laws against animal cruelty, which have not been enforced, shows that
those measures have been ineffective, which means stronger measures, laws and enforcement are needed
(if anybody actually gives a shit about stopping animal cruelty, and some do).
Obviously, having laws on the books that say "You mustn't be cruel to animals" is not working. So, an actual enforced ban on the trade may be a better answer, and this is what (sorry!), the
INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT officals have also agreed with.
4) I am fairly sure that the Dog Meat Free Indonesia coalition, made up of HSI, Four Paws, Jakarta Animal Aid Network, Animal Friends Jogja and Change for Animals Foundation, is
not composed entirely of "nosy foreigners" but mostly Indonesians who are opposed to the dog and cat meat trade, AND animal cruelty in general.
So all this crap about "just busybody foreigners who want to stick their nose in" is basically bullshit, or at least it is from my perspective.
And my saying that
I support an initiative by public officials in the Indonesian national government to implement a ban is entirely valid.
PS: "Euc", I believe you may be confusing the words "collaborating" and "corroborating".