- Joined
- Aug 7, 2016
- Messages
- 3,055
This has me in stitches....the lawyer says the amount of money involved is too small so his client must be innocent. This implies that his client would only commit the crime if it was worth more...
jeez what jurisprudence logic does that come from...I doubt if the ancient Egyptians, who are credited with creating law, could come up with that philosophy.
From Jakarta Globe....
"Soon after the arrest, the KPK named Irman, a Democratic Party senior politician, a suspect for allegedly accepting a bribe of Rp 100 million (US$7,600) in return for his services in recommending an increased quota on imported sugar to West Sumatra.....
Contacted separately, Irman’s attorney Tommy Singh said his client was not a junior politician who would accept such a small amount of cash as a bribe.
“The amount is too small. This is not his caliber,†Tommy told reporters."
jeez what jurisprudence logic does that come from...I doubt if the ancient Egyptians, who are credited with creating law, could come up with that philosophy.
From Jakarta Globe....
"Soon after the arrest, the KPK named Irman, a Democratic Party senior politician, a suspect for allegedly accepting a bribe of Rp 100 million (US$7,600) in return for his services in recommending an increased quota on imported sugar to West Sumatra.....
Contacted separately, Irman’s attorney Tommy Singh said his client was not a junior politician who would accept such a small amount of cash as a bribe.
“The amount is too small. This is not his caliber,†Tommy told reporters."

