It is not the same since there is no central religious text which states that it was 'revealed' in 'clear English language' and that this was a 'divine choice' which 'must be preserved'. That would be ridiculous!
I was quoting the Quran in post #58 with regards to the use of Arabic.
This was in reply to posts about studying Arabic and how it is perceived by many persons that classroom hours and Indonesian education budgets might be better spent on languages such as English or Chinese.
If your post was meant to show how experts have identified almost 300 non-Arabic words in the Quran despite the Quran apparently contradicting itself by stating that it was 'revealed' in 'clear Arabic language' because there were loan words used...well, that is probably a better compromise than hard-liners would allow.