Medical insurance in Australia

Anglian

Well-Known Member
Charter Member
Cager
Joined
Jul 17, 2016
Messages
2,462
I was mistakenly under the impression that over 75 it was mandatory to have medical insurance to visit Australia, I’ve been looking at various web sites and I believe I am mistaken and perhaps caused some people to be concerned, but the way I read it now is you have to have adequate funds for over 70s
I’ve visited Australia twice yearly for the past 15 years and never once been asked for medical insurance, although it is required I think on an E600 visa not a E 651 visa
 
Thanks for your update Anglian...that is helpful as I'm going to OZ tomorrow night and, due to age and medical condition, cannot get medical insurance.
However, I did comply with Australia's 'Electronic Travel Authority' (ETA) (subclass 601) questions and it was issued for entry for one year with a maximum stay of 3 months each visit.

This is what the ETA application form says.....
Health insurance
You are responsible for all your health costs while you are in Australia. You will not be covered by Australia's national health scheme (Medicare) unless your country has a reciprocal health care agreement with Australia.
We recommend that you take out health insurance each time you travel to Australia.
 
Apologies if I caused any alarm due to my miss reading info on travel to Australia
 
I'm curious what the cost of a plan that covers Hospital stays, minor surgery, medicine coverage and medicine, for lets say Bali coverage with Safety Wings for someone 70 years old? I'm an American? I have BPJS but I needed minor surgery for a lump under the armpit, and some small skin cancer spots removed. Wing Amerta wouldn't take BPJS, only Private insurance which I didn't have. To get 3 spots on the skin removed cost 8 Jt. Does anyone around 70 years old have Safety Wings, and what is the cost?
 
I'm curious what the cost of a plan that covers Hospital stays, minor surgery, medicine coverage and medicine, for lets say Bali coverage with Safety Wings for someone 70 years old? I'm an American? I have BPJS but I needed minor surgery for a lump under the armpit, and some small skin cancer spots removed. Wing Amerta wouldn't take BPJS, only Private insurance which I didn't have. To get 3 spots on the skin removed cost 8 Jt. Does anyone around 70 years old have Safety Wings, and what is the cost?
You need to be cautious about this: unless you disclose a pre-existing condition when applying, health insurance will typically not cover it. If you require surgery, it’s important to declare it upfront. That said, it’s unclear whether minor procedures like the removal of a lump under the armpit or treatment for a small skin cancer must be disclosed. It’s best to confirm this directly with the insurance provider.

Keep in mind, however, that insurers may use non-disclosure as grounds to deny your claim when you need coverage. Conditions like small skin cancers or lumps generally don’t develop overnight, especially within the first year of coverage. A private Insurance company is a profitable business operate based on statistics and risk assessment no provider wants to insure something that is already likely to incur a loss.
 
In France, for retirees living overseas we have the CFE, which is an extension of our National Social Security system. Government run, no need to declare pre existing conditions or things like that.
I did a simulation (72 old, single)
The cost is 147 € per month
(2.800.000 Idr)
I have no long term medical issues, never been in a hospital in my life.
I am here since 7 years :
7*12*147 = 12.348 € or 236 million Idr....

Doesn't make sense to me. Better have an emergency fund in the bank.
And anyway if I was diagnostic with cancer or any REAL serious problem, I will let nature handle. The Miss has the necessary instructions.....
 
I have read a few stories like this. It is a reminder to read the T&C of your insurance carefully. Allianz is relatively reputable insurance giant.
 

Attachments

  • 529700079_10162092348246173_6832183002010925553_n.jpg
    529700079_10162092348246173_6832183002010925553_n.jpg
    155.1 KB · Views: 66
I have read a few stories like this. It is a reminder to read the T&C of your insurance carefully. Allianz is relatively reputable insurance giant.
From my experience with allianz ,they are a bad joke ,I would never recommend that mafia company, when I needed help for surgery after 15 years without a claim , no help for my wife to claim , Bpjs saved my ass !
 
You need to be cautious about this: unless you disclose a pre-existing condition when applying, health insurance will typically not cover it. If you require surgery, it’s important to declare it upfront. That said, it’s unclear whether minor procedures like the removal of a lump under the armpit or treatment for a small skin cancer must be disclosed. It’s best to confirm this directly with the insurance provider.

Keep in mind, however, that insurers may use non-disclosure as grounds to deny your claim when you need coverage. Conditions like small skin cancers or lumps generally don’t develop overnight, especially within the first year of coverage. A private Insurance company is a profitable business operate based on statistics and risk assessment no provider wants to insure something that is already likely to incur a loss.
So if someone needs an operation. Is that considered a loss? Isn't it their business to provide coverage to fix People's bodies? Or is it just, You Pay every month, but when you need help, that's not profitable, and a loss, so they won't pay?
 
In France, for retirees living overseas we have the CFE, which is an extension of our National Social Security system. Government run, no need to declare pre existing conditions or things like that.
I did a simulation (72 old, single)
The cost is 147 € per month
(2.800.000 Idr)
I have no long term medical issues, never been in a hospital in my life.
I am here since 7 years :
7*12*147 = 12.348 € or 236 million Idr....

Doesn't make sense to me. Better have an emergency fund in the bank.
And anyway if I was diagnostic with cancer or any REAL serious problem, I will let nature handle. The Miss has the necessary instructions.....
Is this because of your age? Once I heard YouTubers talking about how they only had to payed $35 or something close to that because they were still in their 20's. I looked into coverage for someone my age, and it was Hundred's of $ a month! It seems they don't want to help us Old timers! We have out grown our usefulness to society. We don't work anymore, pay taxes, have more Children that will grow up and pay taxes!
I went to the Hospital yesterday and it struck me that they really don't want to help, when the first they want to talk about is Money! And pay up front for work not even performed yet! And what they quoted I really didn't understand, so I asked to pay with BPJS. They said the policy is instead of already being there, talking directly to the Specialist I need, I have to go to a small clinic, then a small hospital, then another small hospital, talk to a unqualified Doctor to get the recommendation to go see the Doctor I was already talking too! Is this run around designed to make us give up or spread the wealth to Small hospital, Doctors, and waste precious time in fixing my Problem? If someone out there can explain their procedure, then please do?
So Society just wants to put us in a home, take all our savings, keep us doped up, and hope we will die soon! I thought Growing Old was suppose to be an Honorable Position?
 
Last edited:
So if someone needs an operation. Is that considered a loss?
Yes, if it wasn’t factored into their revenue model when determining your premium. That’s why, in any private health insurance, you’re asked to disclose pre-existing conditions so the insurer can calculate the premium they’ll charge you. If you fail to disclose this information, the insurer may use that non-disclosure as a legitimate reason to deny your claim when you make a claim.

So if someone needs an operation. Is that considered a loss? Isn't it their business to provide coverage to fix People's bodies?
Unless it’s heavily subsidized such as those run by the government, a charity, or a non-profit organization, private health insurance operates as a business, and one of its primary objectives is to generate profit.

Or is it just, You Pay every month, but when you need help, that's not profitable, and a loss, so they won't pay?
Health insurance terms and conditions always require you to disclose any pre-existing conditions. Failure to do so gives the insurer a legitimate reason to reject your claim.

Regulators, watchdogs, and ombudsmen are primarily responsible for ensuring that their actions is in compliance with the T&C. In addition you have the option to take them to the court. Unfortunately, in Indonesia, it seems to me that these bodies are not functioning well in carrying out their duties effectively.

A few striking examples from the past show how these institutions have operated. Take certain insurance products, such as life insurance bundled with investment schemes. Even state-owned insurers like BUMIPUTRA, JIWASRAYA, and ASABRI became involved in some of the largest corruption cases in Indonesia’s history. More recently, when people found their accounts suddenly frozen at times they needed them most, one has to wonder, what were the regulators and watchdogs doing?
 
Last edited:
Self-insuring works out way better in the long term unless you are extremely unlucky. [especially if you factor in the likelihood of your insurer actually paying out].
 
Self-insuring works out way better in the long term unless you are extremely unlucky. [especially if you factor in the likelihood of your insurer actually paying out].
In the country with not well functioning regulators, I tend to agree. But when the regulator are functioning well and the insurers were found deliberately avoiding their obligations, they will be met with a huge fine. In addition they will also be ordered to pay compensation. So when they want to avoid their obligation, they will make sure they have a leg to stand. Declaration of the Pre-existing condition will always certain be stated in the T&C so they could legally refuse the claim.

In Indonesia, take the example of state-owned insurers such as BUMIPUTRA, JIWASRAYA, and ASABRI. These aren’t even health insurance providers, but rather life insurance bundled with investment products a sector with far larger sums of money to make. So, what were the regulators and watchdogs actually doing?

Keep in mind that you have the freedom to choose where to buy your insurance, including from companies regulated by strong oversight bodies. In some countries, travel insurance is even mandatory for securing a visa. A single serious accident could easily turn monthly premium you pay of just a few hundred dollars into bills totaling hundreds of thousands of USD, or in few cases could even multi million USD. But each to their own, and this is just my personal opinion.
 
Last edited:
For someone to have an accident on holiday that requires hundreds of thousands of dollars to pay out, I would say you would have to be extremely unlucky or extremely careless.
Of course there have been cases where it has happened (well publicised by insurance company marketing departments) but I would guess that if you took a total of 1,000 trips, the chances of it happening even once in those 1,000 trips are still a tiny fraction of 1%.
People tend to purchase that kind of insurance because they don't understand the laws of probability.
On the other hand if you are intending to ride around Bali on a motorbike while drunk without a helmet then you might be well advised to purchase that type of insurance. But you might also find that the insurance company would refuse to pay out because you weren't following the laws.
 
Yes, if it wasn’t factored into their revenue model when determining your premium. That’s why, in any private health insurance, you’re asked to disclose pre-existing conditions so the insurer can calculate the premium they’ll charge you. If you fail to disclose this information, the insurer may use that non-disclosure as a legitimate reason to deny your claim when you make a claim.


Unless it’s heavily subsidized such as those run by the government, a charity, or a non-profit organization, private health insurance operates as a business, and one of its primary objectives is to generate profit.


Health insurance terms and conditions always require you to disclose any pre-existing conditions. Failure to do so gives the insurer a legitimate reason to reject your claim.

Regulators, watchdogs, and ombudsmen are primarily responsible for ensuring that their actions is in compliance with the T&C. In addition you have the option to take them to the court. Unfortunately, in Indonesia, it seems to me that these bodies are not functioning well in carrying out their duties effectively.

A few striking examples from the past show how these institutions have operated. Take certain insurance products, such as life insurance bundled with investment schemes. Even state-owned insurers like BUMIPUTRA, JIWASRAYA, and ASABRI became involved in some of the largest corruption cases in Indonesia’s history. More recently, when people found their accounts suddenly frozen at times they needed them most, one has to wonder, what were the regulators and watchdogs doing?
Ok, you made your point 3 times about pre- disclosing a pre-condition. That was not what I was referring to. I was referring to them charging outrageous prices for elderly people, because of their age the insurance company might not make so much profit! If they wouldn't charge such over the top expensive monthly payments, I would be happy to tell them of any pre-existing condition, and buy Insurance. So are saying, if you told them about a pre-existing condition, does that mean they would charge you so much that you would basically be paying for your own operation? Then why would anyone buy insurance if they don't pay to help you, but only make you pay monthly to make profit? I was also referring to the outrageous demands of BPJS for a person to go to a clinic, then a small Hospital, then to another small Hospital to talk to an unqualified Doctor, to get him to refer you to a Specialist, when You had already been seen by the Specialist!
I pay the maximum amount to BPJS they ask for. I would even be happy to pay more, if They provided quicker, better service!
This is such an outrageous story of legal Criminality, being done by Insurance Companies! Where is our Governments controlling this type of thievery, when it's happening to Millions of People daily! 🫵🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏾‍♀️
 
I was referring to them charging outrageous prices for elderly people, because of their age the insurance company might not make so much profit!
Because age has direct correlation with higher probability in making claim related to health. And here we are referring to private health insurance not state funded and/or highly subsidized insurance program.

So are saying, if you told them about a pre-existing condition, does that mean they would charge you so much that you would basically be paying for your own operation?
If the cost of treatment will definitely be incurred, amount is already known and isn’t a distance possibility, then the answer is almost certainly yes. But if the premium is too high that will make them look bad, they will simply refuse to insure you in the first instance. After all, The private insurance are there to make profit, why would they take on a client who is guaranteed to be a loss for them?

Suppose you have a history of diabetes, high cholesterol, or another condition, and later it leads to complications like kidney failure or a stroke. What would the cost of treatment be? And that’s not even counting coverage for other illnesses, major accidents, or emergency hospitalizations. When you add it all up, is it not true that it will already exceed a few hundred USD you’ve been paying? But the loss in this case is not a certainty it is just a probability.

When you pay your premium, the insurer (especially private non subsidized insurer) takes on your financial risk, that’s their business model. If your total treatment costs end up being less than the premiums you’ve paid, they win. If the costs are higher, you win.

I was also referring to the outrageous demands of BPJS for a person to go to a clinic, then a small Hospital, then to another small Hospital to talk to an unqualified Doctor, to get him to refer you to a Specialist, when You had already been seen by the Specialist!
That’s their standard procedure. For your information, even the NHS in England and health systems in some other developed countries follow the same rule, you can’t see a specialist, go directly to hospital, exclusive hospital/clinics of your choice for operation or special treatment without a referral from your GP. Typically, there will be a queue. The exception is for accident and emergency treatment or life saving operation. If you want to jump this queue you have to go private and pay from your own pocket. Alternatively, there is a private health insurance plans that allow you to bypass this step, but those come with significantly higher premiums.

I pay the maximum amount to BPJS they ask for. I would even be happy to pay more, if They provided quicker, better service!
This is such an outrageous story of legal Criminality, being done by Insurance Companies! Where is our Governments controlling this type of thievery, when it's happening to Millions of People daily!
You’re using very strong terms like “criminality” and “theft.” Not many people on this earth would want to have a business with criminals, thieves. I wonder why do not you just terminate your subscription?

For some people especially at a certain age, the regular expenses for health care, check-ups, and medications alone often already exceed Rp150,000? And that’s just for routine needs, it doesn’t even include the costs of hospitalization, ICU stays, or accident-related treatments when needed.

Are you also aware that BPJS is heavily subsidized by the Indonesian government using taxpayer funds, and that it is also likely further supported by contributions from employed individuals, including foreign workers taken from the percentage of their salary.

But I personally see, BPJS is a no brainer for those living in Indonesia permanently, considering the premium of just Rp150k and the direct benefit you get. I give it the credit to the former Indonesian president Joko Widodo for implementing this.
 
Last edited:
But I personally see, BPJS is a no brainer for those leaving in Indonesia permanently, considering the premium of just Rp150k and the direct benefit you get. I give it the credit to the former Indonesian president Joko Widodo for implementing this.
BPJS saves me a lot of money each month just by covering my medications that I must take for the rest of my life. Not to mention a yearly colonoscopy that set me back 30 million when I had to pay. Yes you have to jump through a couple of hoops and some of the problems are on the providers side from milking all they can out of the system. Overall it's a net positive to me and to have to see a couple of extra doctors every few months is a minor inconvenience. My wife also has had MRI's, sonograms and other tests related to a torn ligament without any major hassle at all. Overall it appears to work as good as any government health system.
 
It seems many people see health insurance as simply a matter of signing up, paying a fee and your are covered without really looking at the terms and conditions. As Pantaiema has pointed out, apart from government schemes like BPJS and Medicare in Aus, private insurance is a business with the object of making a profit. Old people are likely to have many more health problems so there cover is more expensive. People with pre-existing heath issues will also pay more.

My WNA wife recently had her motor bike licence expire but was still riding around. I pointed to the recent story in Bali of a young Australian, uninsured, had a serious accident and is in hospital with over a hundred thousand dollars racked up for treatments. She said she would be covered as she has insurance with Prudential and BPJS. Even if insured, were you to ride without a licence and had an accident a private company like Prudential insurance company would not pay. BPJS and Medicare may still cover you but there could be complications. Anyway, I am pleased my wife has now renewed her licence.
 

Users who viewed this discussion (Total:0)

Follow Us

Latest Expat Indo Articles

Latest Tweets by Expat Indo

Online Now

Newest Members

Forum Statistics

Threads
6,583
Messages
110,648
Members
3,871
Latest member
Nadiarrr
Back
Top Bottom