Garuda Indonesia trapped in a relentless financial tailspin

If I am paying from my own pocket, I will typically go for the least expensive option.
You know what they say, sometimes you get what you pay for. I haven't flown AA for several years and I don't intend to ever do it voluntarily.
 
That video seems a little sensationalistic. The claim that GA had half their fleet in heavy maintenance at one time is difficult to take at face value. It may be that half their fleet was in (not so heavy) maintenance or storage, which isn't the same. It would be very irregular to have more than a relatively few aircraft in calendar check at the same time. That's not to say that they're not in a bind; they certainly are.

As of late November 2025, approximately 34 aircraft from the Garuda Indonesia Group (including Citilink) remain grounded due to technical maintenance delays and spare parts shortages, with plans for a full return to operation by 2026. The issue stems from financial constraints affecting maintenance, rather than structural safety defects.


They have a huge maintenance backlog, because no money to buy the parts, pay subcons for fhe maintenances, pay outstanding bills with suppliers.

Makes one worry about the maintenance of the planes that continue to fly.....
 
Ohh all this petty fuss about maintenance and air worthiness. In the 1980s the chief pilot of Air India said that a locally produced version of one of the main jet aircraft at the time would not have sufficient thrust to stay in the air if one engine failed. The problem was quickly resolved by putting the chief pilot in gaol. All tht Garuda requires is a bit of executive imaginative management and these maintenance issues can be disappeared.
 
Ohh all this petty fuss about maintenance and air worthiness. In the 1980s the chief pilot of Air India said that a locally produced version of one of the main jet aircraft at the time would not have sufficient thrust to stay in the air if one engine failed. The problem was quickly resolved by putting the chief pilot in gaol. All tht Garuda requires is a bit of executive imaginative management and these maintenance issues can be disappeared.

Almost like this


 

As of late November 2025, approximately 34 aircraft from the Garuda Indonesia Group (including Citilink) remain grounded due to technical maintenance delays and spare parts shortages, with plans for a full return to operation by 2026. The issue stems from financial constraints affecting maintenance, rather than structural safety defects.


They have a huge maintenance backlog, because no money to buy the parts, pay subcons for fhe maintenances, pay outstanding bills with suppliers.

Makes one worry about the maintenance of the planes that continue to fly.....
Ok so grounded for spares and not for heavy checks then. There must be a serious backlog of spares since most all can be swapped between the same type of aircraft. They've got their own maintenance facility too. Let's hope they get things in order soon for the flying public's benefit.
 
But the whole thing with planes and airlines is you have to keep them running. Parking a 380 up for 6 months is suicidal excuse the word.

Ignoring the financial part

But for the maintenance the longer a plane sits there the more and more expensive and troublesome the maintenance is going to be when finally you want it flying again. Not just an oil change and wash the windows down.

Gonna have to break down the engines. Check gaskets. Drain and clean oil lines and tanks etc etc.

C or D. HMV. Not an easy thing. Or quick.
 

As of late November 2025, approximately 34 aircraft from the Garuda Indonesia Group (including Citilink) remain grounded due to technical maintenance delays and spare parts shortages, with plans for a full return to operation by 2026. The issue stems from financial constraints affecting maintenance, rather than structural safety defects.


They have a huge maintenance backlog, because no money to buy the parts, pay subcons for fhe maintenances, pay outstanding bills with suppliers.

Makes one worry about the maintenance of the planes that continue to fly.....

In capital-intensive sectors such as airlines, depreciation, maintenance, and fleet renewal rank among the most significant and essential expenses. Aircraft don’t simply wear out over time; they require routine inspections, major maintenance checks, engine overhauls, and ultimately replacement at the end of their service life. When these costs are properly accounted for in both the profit and loss statement and the balance sheet, sufficient funds should be available to cover repairs, component replacements, and eventual fleet renewal.

In Garuda case, marked up in procurement have already been established in court, with those found guilty receiving sentences. In addition, it’s possible that depreciation, part replacement costs were understated on the book. Not to mention additional cost if the aircraft are grounded, not immediately repaired when needed.

If depreciation, parts replacement costs were understated, In the early years following injections of state or taxpayer funding, a project may appear highly profitable on paper. However, a few years later when significant maintenance or aircraft replacement is required, the necessary funds may no longer be available.

Although Garuda Indonesia is a state-owned enterprise, it is listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange(IDX) under the ticker symbol GIAA where the Indonesian government remains the majority shareholder.. In principle, anyone with access to that stock market, including individuals in this forum could purchase shares and become partial owners of the airline. if he wants.
 
Last edited:
Keep in mind that most of Garuda's fleet is leased, and that even grounded the monthly lease still need to be paid. And that is a cash outflow.
Contrary to a paid and owned aircraft where yearly depreciation is just a movement on the balance sheet. Except if there is a loan behind.....

"As of late 2024/early 2025, Garuda Indonesia operates with a significantly restructured, smaller fleet to manage financial pressure, with roughly 69–75 total aircraft. While a specific, up-to-the-minute number of leased versus owned aircraft is not explicitly stated in recent fleet updates, the vast majority of their fleet has historically been leased, with ongoing restructuring to renegotiate these lease terms"

  • Leasing Structure: Garuda has been engaged in long-term efforts to renegotiate high leasing costs and return aircraft, having previously reported leasing from dozens of different lessors.
 
But the whole thing with planes and airlines is you have to keep them running. Parking a 380 up for 6 months is suicidal excuse the word.

Ignoring the financial part

But for the maintenance the longer a plane sits there the more and more expensive and troublesome the maintenance is going to be when finally you want it flying again. Not just an oil change and wash the windows down.

Gonna have to break down the engines. Check gaskets. Drain and clean oil lines and tanks etc etc.

C or D. HMV. Not an easy thing. Or quick.
If they did the preservation tasks correctly before and during storage then it shouldn't take so much to get them airworthy, not to the level of C or D check unless a check is due. But it is some extra work.
 

Follow Us

Latest Expat Indo Articles

Latest Tweets by Expat Indo

Online Now

Forum Statistics

Threads
6,608
Messages
111,193
Members
3,888
Latest member
evanmorgan851
Back
Top Bottom