Self-defense is an excuse . Defending your child is another one. You could defend a stranger. You could defend your home from someone with a can full of gas and a hand full of matches...Regardless of there is always 2 sides to a story , there is no excuse for putting your hands on another person be it female or male
I am more an Old Testament guy .....Regardless of there is always 2 sides to a story , there is no excuse for putting your hands on another person be it female or male
I wouldn't use the word "excuse" but rather "good reason" !Self-defense is an excuse . Defending your child is another one. You could defend a stranger. You could defend your home from someone with a can full of gas and a hand full of matches...
* Cue in meditative new age flute*You can't spell 'psychotherapist' without 'psycho', 'the' or the 'r' word. I really don't get your line of reasoning here...
I think that by the time an injured party in a domestic violence situation resorts to retaliation it is most always because they have reached the end of their rope & just don't feel able to find an alternative.Self-defense is an excuse . Defending your child is another one. You could defend a stranger. You could defend your home from someone with a can full of gas and a hand full of matches...
I don't think that making someone feel guilty about defending themselves is helpful.
There is this idiotic form of optimism that people sometimes have though...I think that by the time an injured party in a domestic violence situation resorts to retaliation it is most always because they have reached the end of their rope & just don't feel able to find an alternative.
The alternative is often just to walk away - get out of the relationship. However by the time things have gotten so bad many are so conditioned into the toxic cycle that they feel unable to end it- frequently due to their self worth being in the zero or minus range.
It's not coming from an immature view of domestic violence. People who have a clear definition of violence know, when that line is crossed, and someone strikes you - you either remove yourself from the situation, or defend yourself. Fight or flight. If you cannot remove yourself from the attacker, then we have to talk about the gray area, but let's leave that aside for now.I don't think this is the best thread for mocking or judging people's actions (when they are caught up in the domestic violence cycle).
Domestic violence is a very serious issue with lots of complex situations and emotions involved.
Sometimes when I read the posts I think I deal with 9th graders who have more sensitivity & and tact.
You really do have a very skewed perspective in your own sphere and seem to assume it is the same for everyone.It's not coming from an immature view of domestic violence. People who have a clear definition of violence know, when that line is crossed, and someone strikes you - you either remove yourself from the situation, or defend yourself. Fight or flight. If you cannot remove yourself from the attacker, then we have to talk about the gray area, but let's leave that aside for now.
Do you know why someone like the OP's wife thinks she has carte blanche, and that it's okay to hit him or stab him with a knife? It's because she has never gotten her ass properly kicked. I'm not condoning him beating her, god no, that's beyond the pale. I mean, she has never acted like a damn lunatic and had another female beat her until her ass really looked silly. This is so common that it's practically a law - women never fight. They bicker, undermine, talk and act stupid. The same goes for men who beat their partners. They're emboldened to do it because there's no real repercussion. There is something primeval about getting punched that can set a person straight. Does it correct violent offenders every time? Of course not. There are no absolutes. But there is something about that metallic taste exploding out of a person's skull that will make them re-think their actions (and words).
Sorry to say, but most women don't know what I'm talking about.
People like you are the problem. It's like those horses with blinders on. You refuse to look peripherally and consider other opinions. How do you not get that violent bullies get that way because they prey on the weak??You really do have a very skewed perspective in your own sphere and seem to assume it is the same for everyone.
.
I'm done.
Some people just aren't willing to fight the ones they love. I'd laugh at the idea of some random stranger raising a hand to me, and for sure one of us would be headed to the hospital (possibly/probably me). I am full of rage, but even now, the only time I feel like I was justified in turning my hand to her was when she laid hands on my child. (Even then, I wonder if I am taking pride in the wrong thing.)People like you are the problem. It's like those horses with blinders on. You refuse to look peripherally and consider other opinions. How do you not get that violent bullies get that way because they prey on the weak??
Actually, I'm on the side of a man who is defending himself from a woman who is beating him... or vice versa. I'm against you dictating that as the appropriate response... Really, I'm against you (or me) dictating any particular response.@HappyMan and @Bad_azz
You two have serious reading comprehension problems. The fact that you think I'm condoning a man physically beating a woman, under any circumstances, even if she attacks, supports that notion.
Read some more books, go through a dictionary A - Z, take an online English class, I don't know. Just do something, because you two are making me feel depressed for humanity.
It's not coming from an immature view of domestic violence. People who have a clear definition of violence know, when that line is crossed, and someone strikes you - you either remove yourself from the situation, or defend yourself. Fight or flight. If you cannot remove yourself from the attacker, then we have to talk about the gray area, but let's leave that aside for now.
Do you know why someone like the OP's wife thinks she has carte blanche, and that it's okay to hit him or stab him with a knife? It's because she has never gotten her ass properly kicked. I'm not condoning him beating her, god no, that's beyond the pale. I mean, she has never acted like a damn lunatic and had another female beat her until her ass really looked silly. This is so common that it's practically a law - women never fight. They bicker, undermine, talk and act stupid. The same goes for men who beat their partners. They're emboldened to do it because there's no real repercussion. There is something primeval about getting punched that can set a person straight. Does it correct violent offenders every time? Of course not. There are no absolutes. But there is something about that metallic taste exploding out of a person's skull that will make them re-think their actions (and words).
Sorry to say, but most women don't know what I'm talking about.
Of course. Who wouldn't know this? This is in every literature and study about perpetrators of domestic violence. It's oftentimes learned behavior. I didn't delve into this, since my aim wasn't to cover every aspect of the pathology.I'm sorry to say, but you seem very confused. Typically most people are violent in relationships because that is how they were treated or saw their parents interacting during childhood. They were controlled in this manner and now seek to replicate that control over others using the same means that they were subjected to. That is an oversimplification but in a nutshell, that is essentially it. It's a learned behavior.
Now, what is frustrating here is the number of logical fallacies that you employ to make your points. You don't consider underpinning factors or deeper meaning. You don't consider other people's perspectives and you resort to strange positions to obfuscate real discourse. Above, you resorted to unsophisticated linguistic 'tricks' and now you are arguing from authority because you're not a woman and you have had your behind walloped a few times, presumably.
Well, there is nothing more respectable than humility. Particularly in the form of intellectual honesty. So, moving forward, my advice to you would be to consider long term and short term reasoning and to realize the limits of your knowledge. You only know what others are willing to disclose to you about their personal experiences and being one hundred percent 'right' when discussing human behavior in a public forum is impossible. As an adult, you should be able to enter a conversation with someone that holds different opinions to you and still maintain some sense of composure. There should be no need to dominate conversation and you should be comfortable in the knowledge that a successful conversation is one where you understand your interlocutor's viewpoints with more clarity. Not where you control and dominate the direction of communication...
For the record, I'm male, I've been beaten up in the past and I didn't learn much from it. I interact fairly minimally on this forum but I have been treated well for the most part by other members such as Bad Azz, Atlantis and ChrisTex. All people whose online presence I respect precisely because it is clearly demonstrable that they can have honest and open interactions without the need to dominate discourse.
@HappyManNow, I have you telling me I am weak because I didn't k.o. her every time she had a mental breakdown
Here:@HappyMan
I didn't even suggest anything of the kind. Feel free to quote where that could even be a source of confusion.
How do you not get that violent bullies get that way because they prey on the weak??
I guess @Bad_azz, @HappyMan and @LRB didn't see this? It sounds like I'm advising Matoa to peacefully remove himself from his wife's physical attacks, does it not?To save yourself a lot of money, look into renting a kosan. You're going to need it if divorce is imminent. Also, if you go back to get some things and she's home, have your phone ready to video an attack. You will want evidence beyond the "he said, she said" variety. Just get the proof while you're far from her reach.