All returnees from Syria required to join deradicalization program

"Thus the death penalty, imo, is too lenient....the terrorist, when caught, dead or alive,"

The death penalty isn't carried out on dead people cuz....they're dead. Ineffective really. Dismemberment instead?

"will have to know his/her family will suffer their actions and any judgement and punishment will be on their conscience."

What do you suggest for family members? Would that include friends and those he/she shared a prayer rug with? Think it possible to get it right who is innocent and who isn't with all those in relation to the guilty or no bother with petty details?
 
Last edited:
A one month deradicalization programme consisting of a few sermons and lectures. Yup, sure it's gonna work and solve the problem...
 
I suppose according to some killing Christians isn't a sin and killing homosexuals isn't a sin even throwing them off a roof, quite ok to stone a women to death if she has committed adulatory, so what punishment do you give if it's in the Koran
 
Last edited:
"Thus the death penalty, imo, is too lenient....the terrorist, when caught, dead or alive,"

The death penalty isn't carried out on dead people cuz....they're dead. Ineffective really. Dismemberment instead?

My post #19 actually said...."Thus the death penalty, imo, is too lenient....the terrorist, when caught, dead or alive, will have to know his/her family will suffer their actions and any judgement and punishment will be on their conscience."

If you are going to quote me kindly quote the whole sentence and keep the meaning in context. By shortening ...as you have done...it makes the sentence sound ridiculous. In this case you're only responding to something you want to comprehend and not to what I actually said.
 
[QUOTE="Pimpin, post: 34927, member: 264What do you suggest for family members? Would that include friends and those he/she shared a prayer rug with? Think it possible to get it right who is innocent and who isn't with all those in relation to the guilty or no bother with petty details?[/QUOTE]

My post was to emphasize that the current laws about human rights in most countries were written for a normal world. Recently, this normality has been abused and I'm suggesting that those laws maybe need amending to reflect this new reality.

Most families have knowledge of what their relatives are up to. If a family member commits a terrorist act, or behaves in a nefarious way, privacy law doesn't require them to inform security or police.
It's recorded even when terrorist family members, friends and religious leaders have reported to police no action was taken....authorities said they were restricted given the laws as they stand.

There are courts to satisfy innocence or guilt but the laws, as they stand, appear to legally prevent security personnel from using tools to protect innocent bystanders getting blown up.

I suggest that needs to change and I read most countries are in process to do that...I hope Indonesia also responds to this.
 
If you are going to quote me kindly quote the whole sentence and keep the meaning in context. By shortening ...as you have done...it makes the sentence sound ridiculous. In this case you're only responding to something you want to comprehend and not to what I actually said.

As I do, I responded from what I comprehended.

Ok. I thought you were a native English speaker/writer. Sorry.

Interesting you think you know what I want.
 
Creating more laws or amending them isn't going to curb Islamic terrorist acts. The key has always been and will always be in the hands of the so called Muslim majority. I say so called because they have strayed so far from much of what the Koran says in written word, they are like a different religion. The terrorists represent much closer to much of the Koran writings than the majority minus the peace and loving parts.

Until the majority rise up, regardless of any laws and put the Kibosh on the terrorists, these terrors will continue. The "war on terror" was and will always be lost until the majority has had enough.
 
Creating more laws or amending them isn't going to curb Islamic terrorist acts. The key has always been and will always be in the hands of the so called Muslim majority. I say so called because they have strayed so far from much of what the Koran says in written word, they are like a different religion. The terrorists represent much closer to much of the Koran writings than the majority minus the peace and loving parts.

Until the majority rise up, regardless of any laws and put the Kibosh on the terrorists, these terrors will continue. The "war on terror" was and will always be lost until the majority has had enough.

I don't really agree, my wife and her family hold just as much in horror at these idiots and have nothing in common with them than the name of the religion they supposedly follow. Moderate muslims often condemn killings and so on, but who listens to them. You only need to read a little of what DanInAceh writes to understand that moderate muslims are considered to be misguided and wrong to understand that extremists would not listen to moderates anyway.

Could Christians in America have stopped Anders Breivik ? So why are the moderate muslim majority going to have any more or less influence than any other person on ISIL and the other morons ?
 
Yes some have spoken up but few and far between and if there has been any action put to words (rise up), I haven't heard about it.

You are comparing one case or you could speak of a few cases. Apples and oranges.
 
Well much to the surprise of everyone the Iraqi army has taken Mosul, probably with not too many prisoners, most residents of Mosul it seems on the TV images are very pleased to see the end of ISIS, is it the end of ISIS, probably not.
What to do with ISIS survivors, most of what they have been doing is allowed in the Koran, so you are going to have a job to convince them they are wrong, you might reconvert some but the hardliners never,
 

Users who viewed this discussion (Total:0)

Follow Us

Latest Expat Indo Articles

Latest Tweets by Expat Indo

Latest Activity

New posts Latest threads

Online Now

No members online now.

Newest Members

Forum Statistics

Threads
6,673
Messages
112,818
Members
3,968
Latest member
riosan
Back
Top Bottom