Since she was singled out for this humiliation, I don't mind her getting special honor from the president as compensation. Common sense and compassion prevail today in Indonesia, can't happen too often. She is still in high school for god's sake, a minor committing no crime but treated like one.Good for him or them or who ever. It was the right move except I wouldn't have singled her out for the invitation. It was a team to begin with.
And, if I get a Kitas visa and then Kitap and I am asked to become President after Jokowi steps down I will introduce a similar Ministery for Uncomplicating Things in Indonesia.
This has similarity to Gloria who's mother simply was unaware she needed to document her daughter as a WNI before a deadline. The Indonesian Supreme Court has now overruled her appeal so, although unlikely Gloria will be deported, it is possible and, after she is 21, she will be seen as a foreigner in a country she was born and has only ever known....and will need a visa to remain.
Maybe Trump is taking a leaf from Indonesia's harsh rules in this respect.
DACA has always been presidential overreach by deferring executive enforcement unilaterally. Obama knew well that it can be overturned by the next guy or the next next guy in office any time. The proper way is to get it legislated through Congress which is what Trump is doing right now.
There is almost no similarity. Gloria has a WNI mother, who can sponsor her for KITAP, which I'm guessing she is on now. She can apply for citizenship immediately, as she has fulfilled the part of living in Indonesia for over 5 years continuously. There is zero chance she will be deported.
In fact the Supreme Court decision only affects whether her petition for citizenship is seen as a dual citizenship giving up foreign citizenship, or a foreigner gaining Indonesian citizenship. The main difference being that the latter costs about Rp 45 juta more.
In fact none of this is a big deal, and Gloria is in the same shoes as thousands of other mixed marriage kids prior to the 2006 law, including myself.
The background to this is here....
"Republican leaders from 10 states, led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, gave President Trump a deadline of Sept. 5 to end DACA or they'd sue. They believe the program is an abuse of executive power, and feel that only Congress can provide such a broad "amnesty" to any group of undocumented immigrants."
If Trump's real intent is to process this executive order by Congress, to have it ratified, he needs to articulate that. I believe he will make a speech on the subject today...I'll be interested to listen.
The official press release is here:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/09/05/statement-president-donald-j-trump
In fact none of this is a big deal, and Gloria is in the same shoes as thousands of other mixed marriage kids prior to the 2006 law, including myself.
I think you are choosing your own perspective of what I said and I wonder why you mention it...your description of her was suffice to make your point.
The similarity I was referring is that Gloria was a child, and had no input to her status, and neither do the children under DACA.
I confess i don't know much about this law but wasn't it promulgated to give all children of mixed-marriage the opportunity to be of dual-nationality until becoming adult?
I thought the Gloria situation came about because her mother was unaware there was a time limit to register for that opportunity.
I also thought all subsequent children, born since the enactment, are still offered that opening.
However, since Gloria was born prior to 2006, her mother had to register her prior to a deadline (I think it was 2010 or so, it was fairly generous) to be eligible. Since her mother didn't do this, she is still in the same status as all other mixed marriage kids prior to 2006 law, namely foreigners with citizenship deriving from the father only.