In my view it is far from 'the same thing' or 'fine' . When you say something like that , we would appreciate if you give the reference from where you got it .
From
https://www.expatindo.org/community/threads/alcohol-from-beverages-is-toxic.8008/ (World Health Organization)
[Alcohol is a toxic substance ... and has been classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the
International Agency for Research on Cancer decades ago – this is the highest risk group, which also includes asbestos, radiation and tobacco. Alcohol causes at least seven types of cancer ...
Risks start from the first drop
... the risk to the drinker’s health starts from the first drop of any alcoholic beverage ...]
https://www.expatindo.org/community/threads/alcohol-from-beverages-is-toxic.8008/page-2 Post No#23
Should we assume that WHO health experts are more knowledgeable than health specialists in countries renowned for medical, health, nutrition research as well as strict food and drink regulations, such as those in Europe and the U.S.?
In Europe, Western and Eastern European countries, moderate alcohol consumption has been part of tradition for centuries, since ancient times, including among the Vikings and Romans.
In Asia, countries such as Japan (with sake), Korea (soju), and China (baijiu) have their own drinking cultures centered around national beverages.
Now, compare this with
the life expectancy of populations in places where alcohol is banned or heavily restricted, like Indonesia. The difference itself is an evidence. Certainly, other factor also contribute, but at least it serves as evidence that drinking alcohol in moderation will not shorten your life expectancy.
Human health and anatomy are highly complex, and even today experts are still uncovering new findings. Just because an inherent benefit has not yet been identified does not mean it does not exist.
Many people who have tried will know the difference between eating red meat or a tender steak with red wine or beer compared to pairing it with water, or enjoying white wine, beer alongside fish and shellfish.
Certainly drinking clean water is better than consuming alcoholic drink, but this is simply stating the obvious since everyone knows that water is cheaper and abundant, at least everyone knows that it is good for your pocket. I can not blame WHO for their view about drinking alcohol, as less alcohol will mean more money will be available to provide basic sanitary, clean water, and to combat poverty. More money will be available for ordinary people pocket that could be used to buy medication or health treatment when needed.
Do you consume sugar or salt even though you know that avoiding them completely would be healthier? Do you ride your motorbike to go shopping or sightseeing, even though staying at home would reduce your risk of accidents? If your answer is yes, then why?
Did you watch James bond movie what is James Bond’s signature and favorite drink ? Did you watch UFC or other MMA event, are you aware that many MMA fighters drink alcohol. These people could take more than five people who just drink water.
This is Tom Aspinal a British UFC heavy weight champion sharing pint moment with mate Curtis Blade.
This is what he said: '
A beer makes everything feel better'
The utilitarian principle shows that people constantly balance between enjoyment pleasure, happiness against potential pain, suffering, risks, and this has always influenced human decision-making. If we approach the issue from this perspective, the debate could go on endlessly.
Even religious leaders, the Pope, pastors, and priest. all of them consume alcohol in moderation. On the top of that 'Jesus' and his disciples also drink alcohol which suggests that drinking alcohol is not a sin.


