harryopal1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2016
- Messages
- 2,508
We do not have to go far back in Australian or European history to find all kinds of inconsistencies as to hygiene needs, inadequate building standards or where religious beliefs limit the possibilities of a better life. In Australia in the 1950s many inner suburban areas were not connected to a sewerage system. Instead there were outhouses adjacent to a lane. A truck would come along every few days, the "nightman" would come along, lift a flap on the lane side of the dunny, take out the bucket and empty the nightsoil into the truck. Most working people used torn up newspapers. Much more affordable than toilet paper.
So many of houses in working class suburbs were tiny and cramped with little regard to luxuries like large windows to allow light or views. Without money for adequate maintenance over time these buildings became tattered and forlorn and were regarded as slums. Eventually a modicum of wealth trickled down, the slum houses were torn down and houses became bigger with nice large, airy windows and well maintained.
If I am not incorrect, in working class Glasgow, few houses had bathrooms. People would take their towels and soaps and walk to a public bathing house. Not because the Scots were dirty but crushingly poor with higher standards of hygiene facilities beyond reach.
Living in Sitiawan, Perak Malaysia in the 70s, along the main road were large metal bins about 14 feet long, 5 feet wide and six feet tall with huge metal lids. Night soil from adjacent houses was dumped into these bins. Walking down the road it was rather aromatic. Now Sitiawan is sewered.
As for "wasteful" religious habits working class people in many Christian countries were habituated by the churches into seeing virtue in sacrifice and the making of offerings to the churches as essential for their spiritual well being and ending up in heaven rather than hell. Huge, enormously expensive cathedrals dotted the landscapes with much of the funds coming from families where the average bread winner man might own two shirts, a pair of shoes and maybe a suit and with the rest of the family similarly sparsely clothed. But at church they would still make their sacrificial offerings or tithes. Living in poverty in this life was accepted as means of ensuring the joys of a blissful hereafter.
Merah Putih has summarized the problems rather nicely. There is not much point in constantly hammering local people for perceived inadequacies or ignorance when much of it is rooted in poverty. It may be several more generations before the economy in Indonesia sees many of these detailed, seemingly illogical methods to do with hygiene, construction and standards of living uplifted.
So many of houses in working class suburbs were tiny and cramped with little regard to luxuries like large windows to allow light or views. Without money for adequate maintenance over time these buildings became tattered and forlorn and were regarded as slums. Eventually a modicum of wealth trickled down, the slum houses were torn down and houses became bigger with nice large, airy windows and well maintained.
If I am not incorrect, in working class Glasgow, few houses had bathrooms. People would take their towels and soaps and walk to a public bathing house. Not because the Scots were dirty but crushingly poor with higher standards of hygiene facilities beyond reach.
Living in Sitiawan, Perak Malaysia in the 70s, along the main road were large metal bins about 14 feet long, 5 feet wide and six feet tall with huge metal lids. Night soil from adjacent houses was dumped into these bins. Walking down the road it was rather aromatic. Now Sitiawan is sewered.
As for "wasteful" religious habits working class people in many Christian countries were habituated by the churches into seeing virtue in sacrifice and the making of offerings to the churches as essential for their spiritual well being and ending up in heaven rather than hell. Huge, enormously expensive cathedrals dotted the landscapes with much of the funds coming from families where the average bread winner man might own two shirts, a pair of shoes and maybe a suit and with the rest of the family similarly sparsely clothed. But at church they would still make their sacrificial offerings or tithes. Living in poverty in this life was accepted as means of ensuring the joys of a blissful hereafter.
Merah Putih has summarized the problems rather nicely. There is not much point in constantly hammering local people for perceived inadequacies or ignorance when much of it is rooted in poverty. It may be several more generations before the economy in Indonesia sees many of these detailed, seemingly illogical methods to do with hygiene, construction and standards of living uplifted.
Last edited:
