U.S. Stocks’ Total Value May Be Too High

marcus

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2024
Messages
870
From https://finance.yahoo.com/news/warren-buffett-indicator-surged-above-205215605.html
Title : The ‘Warren Buffett Indicator’ has surged above 200%, meaning the market’s price is far ahead of the economy’s size
By Ashley Lutz , October 2025

The “Warren Buffett Indicator” is a simple yardstick that compares the total U.S. stock market’s value (often proxied by the Wilshire 5000) to the size of the U.S. economy. It’s recently surged above 200%, a level Buffett once warned is like “playing with fire,” ...

In Buffett’s playbook, this backdrop favors quality, cash generation, strong moats, and the patience to wait for “fat pitches,” rather than chasing what’s already run ...

Historically, very high ratios have coincided with later periods of weaker returns ,...

Fortune‘s Nick Lichtenberg reports U.S. stocks’ total value has surged to roughly 363% of GDPfar above the 212% peak of the dot-com era—amid a decades-long bull market propelled by AI enthusiasm, mega-cap gains, and soaring P/E multiples rather than robust profit growth, with the S&P 500 recently trading near 30x trailing GAAP earnings as earnings barely outpace inflation.

JPMorgan Asset Management’s David Kelly argues most gains since the mid-1980s stem from a rising profit share of GDP and higher multiples, creating “increasingly lofty” scaffolding that may be unsustainable, echoing broader critiques of U.S. financialization since the Reagan era.

The AI boom is central (now): The GPT-5 launch underwhelmed, a summer selloff erased $1 trillion, many GenAI projects fail in practice, data-center buildouts are matching consumer spending’s GDP boost, and AI unicorns tally $2.7 trillion in valuations despite thin revenues. These prompt warnings today’s leaders may be more overvalued than 1990s dot-com names.

All this comes as growth cools . .. and weakening jobs data—undercutting the case for elevated prices and leading strategists to advise diversification beyond U.S. mega-caps into international equities, core fixed income, and alternatives, even as Kelly concedes timing is uncertain after a remarkably long bull run ...
 
Last edited:
From https://finance.yahoo.com/news/warren-buffett-indicator-surged-above-205215605.html
Title : The ‘Warren Buffett Indicator’ has surged above 200%, meaning the market’s price is far ahead of the economy’s size
By Ashley Lutz , October 2025

The “Warren Buffett Indicator” is a simple yardstick that compares the total U.S. stock market’s value (often proxied by the Wilshire 5000) to the size of the U.S. economy. It’s recently surged above 200%, a level Buffett once warned is like “playing with fire,” ...

In Buffett’s playbook, this backdrop favors quality, cash generation, strong moats, and the patience to wait for “fat pitches,” rather than chasing what’s already run ...

Historically, very high ratios have coincided with later periods of weaker returns ,...

Fortune‘s Nick Lichtenberg reports U.S. stocks’ total value has surged to roughly 363% of GDPfar above the 212% peak of the dot-com era—amid a decades-long bull market propelled by AI enthusiasm, mega-cap gains, and soaring P/E multiples rather than robust profit growth, with the S&P 500 recently trading near 30x trailing GAAP earnings as earnings barely outpace inflation.

JPMorgan Asset Management’s David Kelly argues most gains since the mid-1980s stem from a rising profit share of GDP and higher multiples, creating “increasingly lofty” scaffolding that may be unsustainable, echoing broader critiques of U.S. financialization since the Reagan era.

The AI boom is central (now): The GPT-5 launch underwhelmed, a summer selloff erased $1 trillion, many GenAI projects fail in practice, data-center buildouts are matching consumer spending’s GDP boost, and AI unicorns tally $2.7 trillion in valuations despite thin revenues. These prompt warnings today’s leaders may be more overvalued than 1990s dot-com names.

All this comes as growth cools . .. and weakening jobs data—undercutting the case for elevated prices and leading strategists to advise diversification beyond U.S. mega-caps into international equities, core fixed income, and alternatives, even as Kelly concedes timing is uncertain after a remarkably long bull run ...

It is higher than during the dotcom bubble but not yet the highest. See Historical multiple, the P/E ratio of S&P 500 below. But keep in mind the nature of the tech companies during the dotcom bubble is different with the tech companies nowadays. People say, it is good to understand the market rotation and diversify accordingly based on this information. Also people say, In every bull market there’s always a bear market somewhere or vice versa. Not a financial advice.
1759395985297.png


Quite similar to Shiller P/E ratio
1759396308170.png


Market sentiment from Fear and Greed Index, still neutral, it has not reached extreme greed.
1759396458916.png
 
Last edited:
Buffett is just annoyed that while everyone else was making money from AI he was invested in Coca cola and bonds
Warren Buffett is widely recognized as a contrarian investor, and one of his most famous adage is: “Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful.”
However, according to the Fear and Greed Index, the market has not yet reached the stage of extreme greed, but this indicator could change to the extreme in a matter of months, not years. Not a financial advice.
 
Last edited:
He has been fearful to invest in stocks like Nvidia over the last few years whereas the people who have been greedy have seen their money multiply many times over. Who's the genius here?
 
He has been fearful to invest in stocks like Nvidia over the last few years whereas the people who have been greedy have seen their money multiply many times over. Who's the genius here?
Warren Buffett is a value investor, who typically only buys stocks with reasonable valuations. Nvidia, at its current price and revenue, is overvalued with a P/E ratio of 53.22. Typically, it is just a matter of time before it falls to a more reasonable valuation. The forward P/E ratio of 30 is still acceptable, but this is based on many assumptions, which may not necessarily materialize.

Nvidia is not crypto, but a similar case could happen: a few may make a fortune, but many will just lose their money. And don’t forget the dotcom bubble. If we could know what would happen in the future, we would all be billionaires. :D:D:D:D
 
Last edited:

Users who viewed this discussion (Total:0)

Follow Us

Latest Expat Indo Articles

Latest Tweets by Expat Indo

Latest Activity

New posts Latest threads

Online Now

Newest Members

Forum Statistics

Threads
6,690
Messages
113,127
Members
3,994
Latest member
aura
Back
Top Bottom